Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2023
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 1-year results from the open-label extension of a phase III study.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02049138 (Phase 2 Study, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 2 Study, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension (OLE) Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed a Preceding Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) With Upadacitinib (ABT-494)
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Upadacitinib in active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year data from the phase 3 SELECT-AXIS 2 study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 2-year clinical and radiographic results from the open-label extension of the SELECT-AXIS 2 study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Trial
- From Adult to Adolescent: Alignment in Clinical Trials and Outcomes in Axial Spondyloarthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Pediatric Spondyloarthritis.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Interferon-JAK-STAT Axis in Bone Metabolism.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Current and Emerging Therapies for Uveitis in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Scoping Review.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Biologic and targeted synthetic therapies in ankylosing spondylitis: a pharmacological review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic management of axial spondyloarthritis: summary of 2024 update of the Spanish clinical practice guideline (ESPOGUIA).Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Tumor Necrosis FactorInhibitor Refractory Axial Spondyloarthritis: 52-Week Outcomes from a Single-Center Cohort.Archives of rheumatology · 2025Article
- A Real-World Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Upadacitinib, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors or Interleukin-17 Inhibitors in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis After Switching from an Initial Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Article
- JAK Inhibitors and Risk of Cancer in IBD Patients.Cancers · 2025Review
- Juvenile Spondyloarthropathies: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advances-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- State-of-the-Art Review on the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Case Report: The combination of upadacitinib and adalimumab in the treatment of refractory ankylosing spondylitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- JAK-STAT Signaling and Beyond in the Pathogenesis of Spondyloarthritis and Their Clinical Significance.Current rheumatology reports · 2024Review
- Exploring the latest advances in axial spondyloarthritis management.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Article
- HLA-B*27 and Ankylosing Spondylitis: 50 Years of Insights and Discoveries.Current rheumatology reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the phase III SELECT-AXIS programs. We report the 1-year efficacy and safety in patients with AS and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) from the SELECT-AXIS 2 study.
methodsPatients ≥ 18 years with active AS who met the modified New York criteria for AS and were bDMARD-IR received double-blind upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) or placebo for 14 weeks. Patients who completed 14 weeks could enter an open-label extension and receive upadacitinib 15 mg QD for up to 2 years. Efficacy endpoints included the percentage of patients achieving ≥ 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society response (ASAS40), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) low disease activity (LDA), and ASDAS inactive disease (ID); and change from baseline in total and nocturnal back pain, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). Subgroup analyses (bDMARD lack of efficacy versus intolerance, and prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor [TNFi] versus interleukin-17 inhibitor [IL-17i] exposure) were conducted. Binary and continuous efficacy endpoints were assessed using non-responder imputation with multiple imputation (NRI-MI) and as observed (AO) analyses; and mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO, respectively. Safety was assessed based on adverse events. Data through week 52 are reported.
resultsOf 420 randomized patients, 366 (continuous upadacitinib: n = 181; placebo to upadacitinib: n = 185) completed 52 weeks of treatment. At week 52, in the continuous upadacitinib and placebo to upadacitinib groups, ASAS40, ASDAS LDA, and ASDAS ID were achieved by 66% and 65%, 57% and 55%, and 26% and 25% (all NRI-MI); and change from baseline in total back pain, nocturnal back pain, and BASFI was -4.5 and -4.3, -4.6 and -4.4, and -3.6 and -3.5 (all MMRM), respectively. No new safety risks were identified. Subgroup analyses were consistent with the overall study population.
conclusionsUpadacitinib 15 mg QD demonstrated sustained improvement up to 52 weeks in bDMARD-IR patients with AS. Efficacy was generally similar in patients with lack of efficacy versus intolerance to bDMARDs and prior TNFi versus IL-17i exposure.
trial registrationNCT02049138.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.