Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723516›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2023

Medico-economic impact of thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy in lung cancer: multicentre randomised controlled trial (Lungsco01).

Anne-Laure Soilly, Ludwig Serge Aho Glélé, Alain Bernard, Halim Abou Hanna, Marc Filaire, Pierre Magdaleinat, Charles Marty-Ané, François Tronc, Renaud Grima, Jean-Marc Baste and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02502318 (Medicoeconomic Analysis of Lobectomy Using Thoracoscopy vs Thoracotomy for Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02502318 naterminatednot on this map

Medicoeconomic Analysis of Lobectomy Using Thoracoscopy vs Thoracotomy for Lung Cancer: a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRan2015 to 2021Enrolled261ConditionsLung Cancer, LobectomyArmsVideo-thoracoscopy, thoracotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anne-Laure SoillyDirection of Clinical Research and Innovation, Clinical Research Unit-Methodological Support Network, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France. anne-laure.soilly@chu-dijon.fr.
Ludwig Serge Aho GléléDepartment of Epidemiology, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
Alain BernardDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
Halim Abou HannaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
Marc FilaireDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Endocrine Surgery, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pierre MagdaleinatDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Charles Marty-AnéDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
François TroncDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, HCL, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Bron, France.
Renaud GrimaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, HCL, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Bron, France.
Jean-Marc BasteDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
Pascal-Alexandre ThomasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University & APHM, Marseille, France.
Bertrand Richard De LatourDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Arnaud PforrDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Avignon, Avignon, CH, France.
Pierre-Benoît PagèsDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLungsco01 is the first study assessing the real benefits and the medico-economic impact of video-thoracoscopy versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer in the French context.

methodsTwo hundred and fifty nine adult patients from 10 French centres were randomised in this prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial, between July 29, 2016, and November 24, 2020. Survival from surgical intervention to day 30 and later was compared with the log-rank test. Total quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) were calculated using the EQ-5D-3L®. For medico-economic analyses at 30 days and at 3 months after surgery, resources consumed were valorised (€ 2018) from a hospital perspective. First, since mortality was infrequent and not different between the two arms, cost-minimisation analyses were performed considering only the cost differential. Second, based on complete cases on QALYs, cost-utility analyses were performed taking into account cost and QALY differential. Acceptability curves and the 95% confidence intervals for the incremental ratios were then obtained using the non-parametric bootstrap method (10,000 replications). Sensitivity analyses were performed using multiple imputations with the chained equation method.

resultsThe average cumulative costs of thoracotomy were lower than those of video-thoracoscopy at 30 days (€9,730 (SD = 3,597) vs. €11,290 (SD = 4,729)) and at 3 months (€9,863 (SD = 3,508) vs. €11,912 (SD = 5,159)). In the cost-utility analyses, the incremental cost-utility ratio was €19,162 per additional QALY gained at 30 days (€36,733 at 3 months). The acceptability curve revealed a 64% probability of efficiency at 30 days for video-thoracoscopy, at a widely-accepted willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000 (34% at 3 months). Ratios increased after multiple imputations, implying a higher cost for video-thoracoscopy for an additional QALY gain (ratios: €26,015 at 30 days, €42,779 at 3 months).

conclusionsGiven our results, the economic efficiency of video-thoracoscopy at 30 days remains fragile at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000/QALY. The economic efficiency is not established beyond that time horizon. The acceptability curves given will allow decision-makers to judge the probability of efficiency of this technology at other willingness-to-pay thresholds.

trial registrationNCT02502318.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansProspective StudiesThoracoscopyThoracotomyCost analysisCost-utility analysisLung cancer surgeryThoracoscopyThoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID37723516
PMCPMC10507914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.