Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723364›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2023

Recent Advances in CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Approaches for Therapeutic Gene Editing of Stem Cells.

Malihe Lotfi, Dorsa Morshedi Rad, Samaneh Sharif Mashhadi, Atefeh Ashouri, Majid Mojarrad, Sina Mozaffari-Jovin, Shima Farrokhi, Maryam Hashemi, Marzieh Lotfi, Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Overview of Delivery Methods for Gene Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Smart micro/nanoneedles for gene delivery.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Systems to Enhance Gene Editing Efficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Malihe Lotfi *Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Dorsa Morshedi Rad *School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Samaneh Sharif MashhadiMedical Genetics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Atefeh AshouriMedical Genetics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Majid MojarradMedical Genetics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sina Mozaffari-JovinMedical Genetics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Shima FarrokhiStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Maryam HashemiNanotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Marzieh LotfiDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran.
Majid Ebrahimi WarkianiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia. majid.warkiani@uts.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4184-1944
Mohammad Reza AbbaszadeganMedical Genetics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. abbaszadeganmr@mums.ac.ir.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200101860Cancer Institute NSW 2021CDF1148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advancement in genome editing technologies has provided new promises for treating neoplasia, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and monogenic disorders. Recently, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has emerged as a powerful gene editing tool offering advantages, including high editing efficiency and low cost over the conventional approaches. Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), with their great proliferation and differentiation potential into different cell types, have been exploited in stem cell-based therapy. The potential of hPSCs and the capabilities of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has been paradigm-shifting in medical genetics for over two decades. Since hPSCs are categorized as hard-to-transfect cells, there is a critical demand to develop an appropriate and effective approach for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery into these cells. This review focuses on various strategies for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in stem cells.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsPluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationGene EditingHumansStem Cell TransplantationCRISPR/Cas9 systemDelivery technologiesGene editingStem cellsStem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID37723364
PMCPMC10661828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.