Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723316›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Incidence and outcomes of intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fractures during cementless total hip arthroplasty: a prospective three-dimensional computer tomography-based study.

You-Seung Chun, Hwan-Hee Lee, Young-Wook Lim, Yong-Sik Kim, Soon-Yong Kwon, Seung-Chan Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Acetabulum.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

You-Seung ChunDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Chunbo-Ro 271, Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Hwan-Hee LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daeheung-Ro 64, Daejeon, South Korea.
Young-Wook LimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Banpodae-Ro 222, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Yong-Sik KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Banpodae-Ro 222, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Soon-Yong KwonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Banpodae-Ro 222, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Chan KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Tongil-Ro 1021, Eunpyeong-Gu, Seoul, South Korea. kschb129@naver.com.
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRCatholic University of Korea · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnlike periprosthetic femoral fractures, periprosthetic acetabular fractures during total hip arthroplasty (THA) have not been evaluated in detail. We prospectively evaluated the incidence, patterns, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fractures using pre- and postoperative computer tomography (CT).

methodsIn this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 234 consecutive patients (250 hips) who underwent THA and three-dimensional CT before and after the surgery. We assessed the incidence, pattern of fractures, outcomes for each fracture pattern, reoperation and revision rates, Harris hip score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Multivariate regression models were used to identify risk factors for periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

resultsIn total, 43 periprosthetic acetabular fractures (17.2%) were identified via CT. Fractures occurred most frequently at the superolateral wall. Early cup migration occurred in three hips. None of the patients underwent revision surgery for acetabular loosening. Regression modeling showed that rheumatoid arthritis was a significant predictor of periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

conclusionsPeriprosthetic acetabular fractures are not infrequent during cementless THA and are more common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidArthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip FracturesHip ProsthesisPeriprosthetic FracturesSpinal FracturesAcetabulumHumansIncidenceProspective StudiesReoperationRetrospective StudiesTomographyAcetabulumComputed tomographyOutcomesPeriprosthetic fractureRisk factorTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37723316
OpenAlexW4386843673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.