Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723313›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2023

Volumetric changes in the upper airway on CBCT after dentofacial orthopedic interventions - a systematic review.

Ralph M Steegman, Anne-Marie Renkema, Adriaan Schoeman, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Yijin Ren

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional appliances and airway in class II malocclusion : An umbrella review and re-analysis of three meta-analyses.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Ralph M SteegmanDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, BB72 300001, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700RB, The Netherlands. r.m.steegman@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0741-7971
Anne-Marie RenkemaDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, BB72 300001, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700RB, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8832-4899
Adriaan SchoemanDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, BB72 300001, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700RB, The Netherlands.
Anne Marie Kuijpers-JagtmanDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-0090
Yijin RenDepartment of Orthodontics, W.J. Kolff Institute, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2374-1771
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide a critical overview of the effect of various orthodontic and/or dentofacial orthopedic interventions on three-dimensional volumetric changes in the upper airway. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour databases were searched for clinical studies concerning 3D volumetric assessments based on CBCT before and after orthodontics interventions. The quality of the studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. After the use of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the pre-and post-treatment volumes were used to visualize the effect of various orthodontics interventions.

resultsA total of 48 studies were included in this review and none of which were RCTs. The quality of all included studies was assessed as medium. Overall, there is a tendency for an increase in airway volumes after various orthodontic interventions, except for studies concerning extraction therapy with fixed appliances in adults, in which both increases and decreases in airway volumes have been reported.

conclusionOrthodontic treatment by growth modification and non-extraction therapy with fixed appliances, regardless of the malocclusion, generally showed positive effects on the airway volume. Orthodontic treatment in combination with extractions does not provide an unambiguous insight. A consensus on the methodology of the airway measurement and nomenclature is urgently needed in order to gain insight into the effect of different interventions on three-dimensional airway changes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Various orthodontic treatments do not negatively influence the upper airway volume. However, extraction therapy in adults should be chosen with caution, especially in subjects belonging to a group susceptible to airway obstruction.

Indexed as

MalocclusionSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAdultHumansAirwayCBCTDentofacial OrthopedicsOrthodonticsVolumetric changes

Identifiers

PMID37723313
PMCPMC10560168
OpenAlexW4386843740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.