Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723287›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Angiography-based hemodynamic features predict recurrent ischemic events after angioplasty and stenting of intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis.

Kangmo Huang, Weihe Yao, Mingming Zha, Shanmei Qin, Yingle Li, Yan Xu, Rui Liu, Ruidong Ye, Yunfei Han, Wusheng Zhu and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kangmo Huang *Department of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Weihe Yao *Department of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Mingming ZhaDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Shanmei QinDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yingle LiDepartment of Neurology, Jinling Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yan XuNeusoft Medical Systems Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China.
Rui LiuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Ruidong YeDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yunfei HanDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Wusheng ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Zhongzhao TengDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Juan DuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. dujuan_200988@aliyun.com.
Xinfeng LiuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. xfliu2@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8182-9632
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing Medical University · CNNeusoft (China) · CNUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University WK9110000056Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program BE2020697Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program BE2020700the National natural science foundation of China 81870946the National natural science foundation of China U20A20357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the predictive value of hemodynamic features for stroke relapse in patients with intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) using quantitative digital subtraction angiography (q-DSA).

methodsIn this retrospective longitudinal study, patients with intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis and who underwent PTAS treatment between January 2012 and May 2020 were enrolled. The q-DSA assessment was performed before and after PTAS. ROIs 1-4 were placed along the vertebral artery, proximal and distal basilar artery, and posterior cerebral artery; ROIs 5-8 were in 5 mm and 10 mm proximal and distal to the lesion, respectively. Relative time to peak (rTTP) was defined as the difference in TTP between ROIs. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for recurrent stroke.

resultsA total of 137 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 10 [standard deviation], 83.2% males) were included, and 26 (19.0%) patients had stroke relapse during follow-up (median time of 42.6 months [interquartile range, 19.7-60.7]). Preprocedural rTTP

conclusionsIn patients with intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerosis treated with PTAS, preprocedural prolonged TTP of the target vessel and shortened trans-stenotic TTP difference were associated with stroke relapse. Q-DSA-defined hemodynamic parameters provided incremental predictive value over conventional parameters for stroke recurrence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Quantitative DSA analysis enables intuitive observation and semi-quantitative evaluation of peri-therapeutic cerebral blood flow. More importantly, quantitative DSA-defined hemodynamic parameters have the potential for risk stratification of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. KEY POINTS: Semi-quantitative angiography-based parameters can reflect pre- and postprocedural subtle changes in blood flow in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Although angioplasty procedures can significantly improve blood flow status, patients with more restricted baseline blood flow still show a higher risk of stroke recurrence. Angiography-based hemodynamic features possess prognostic value and can serve as clinical markers to assess stroke risk of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisIntracranial ArteriosclerosisStrokeVertebrobasilar InsufficiencyAngiography, Digital SubtractionAngioplastyConstriction, PathologicFemaleHemodynamicsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesStentsCerebral angiographyHemodynamicsIntracranial atherosclerosisRecurrenceStroke

Identifiers

PMID37723287
PMCPMC10957605
OpenAlexW4386843708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.