Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723222›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2023

Drug delivery systems for CRISPR-based genome editors.

Victoria Madigan, Feng Zhang, James E Dahlman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical translation of epigenome editing technologies.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. mRNA medicine for cardiovascular disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026
    Review
  18. WTAP mediated mScience China. Life sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victoria MadiganBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Feng ZhangBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-7995
James E DahlmanWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. james.dahlman@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7580-436X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based drugs can theoretically manipulate any genetic target. In practice, however, these drugs must enter the desired cell without eliciting an unwanted immune response, so a delivery system is often required. Here, we review drug delivery systems for CRISPR-based genome editors, focusing on adeno-associated viruses and lipid nanoparticles. After describing how these systems are engineered and their subsequent characterization in preclinical animal models, we highlight data from recent clinical trials. Preclinical targeting mediated by polymers, proteins, including virus-like particles, and other vehicles that may deliver CRISPR systems in the future is also discussed.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsGene Transfer TechniquesProteinsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.