Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723204›Full record

ArticleNature plants2023

Redesigning the tomato fruit shape for mechanized production.

Qiang Zhu, Lei Deng, Jie Chen, Gustavo R Rodríguez, Chuanlong Sun, Zeqian Chang, Tianxia Yang, Huawei Zhai, Hongling Jiang, Yasin Topcu and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-variant GWAS and genomic prediction dissect the genetic architecture underlying tomato fruit weight.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Different Fruit Shapes ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Fine-mapping and candidate gene analysis of qFF3.1 conferring fruit firmness in a modern tomato variety.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rethinking field trials.Nature plants · 2025
    Article
  14. Molecular breeding of tomato: Advances and challenges.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Qiang Zhu *State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5069-3990
Lei Deng *State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9415-3961
Jie Chen *College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5931-9902
Gustavo R RodríguezInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR-CONICET-UNR), Rosario, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4171-4099
Chuanlong SunState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8346-2312
Zeqian ChangState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-0213
Tianxia YangState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1985-6170
Huawei ZhaiCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6290-4417
Hongling JiangState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-2469
Yasin TopcuInstitute of Plant Breeding, Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-2939
David FrancisDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-1357
Samuel HuttonGulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1635-4861
Liang SunCollege of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5953-6489
Chang-Bao LiKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-8118
Esther van der KnaapInstitute of Plant Breeding, Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-7427
Chuanyou LiState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. cyli@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-3890
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNChina Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Georgia · USConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARFlorida Gulf Coast University · USShandong Agricultural University · CNState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics · CNThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 2021YFF1000103National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31991183, 32072582, U22A20459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop breeding for mechanized harvesting has driven modern agriculture. In tomato, machine harvesting for industrial processing varieties became the norm in the 1970s. However, fresh-market varieties whose fruits are suitable for mechanical harvesting are difficult to breed because of associated reduction in flavour and nutritional qualities. Here we report the cloning and functional characterization of fs8.1, which controls the elongated fruit shape and crush resistance of machine-harvestable processing tomatoes. FS8.1 encodes a non-canonical GT-2 factor that activates the expression of cell-cycle inhibitor genes through the formation of a transcriptional module with the canonical GT-2 factor SlGT-16. The fs8.1 mutation results in a lower inhibitory effect on the cell proliferation of the ovary wall, leading to elongated fruits with enhanced compression resistance. Our study provides a potential route for introducing the beneficial allele into fresh-market tomatoes without reducing quality, thereby facilitating mechanical harvesting.

Indexed as

Solanum lycopersicumAgricultureFruitPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID37723204
OpenAlexW4386826979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.