Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723109›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocol for a double-blinded randomised controlled trial investigating the use of adjunct bicarbonate in carpal tunnel release: a single-centre study.

Mikael Hytönen, Yrjänä Nietosvaara, Aleksi Reito, Joonas Sirola, Noora Heikkinen, Aukusti Savolainen, Mikko P Räisänen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05328180 (aDjunct bicarbonatE in Local anaesthesIa for CarpAl Tunnel rElease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05328180 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

aDjunct bicarbonatE in Local anaesthesIa for CarpAl Tunnel rElease (DELICATE): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKuopio University HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled116ConditionsCarpal Tunnel SyndromeArmsSodium bicarbonate, Control arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mikael HytönenSchool of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland mikael.hytonen@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5042-2832
Yrjänä NietosvaaraSchool of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2220-8008
Aleksi ReitoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-6461
Joonas SirolaSchool of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6761-8276
Noora HeikkinenSchool of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8261-8573
Aukusti SavolainenSchool of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0009-0001-0012-8157
Mikko P RäisänenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-4898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aims to compare the effectiveness of buffered and non-buffered long-acting local anaesthetics in pain relief during and after carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome. Surgical treatment of CTS, CTR, is the most common hand surgical operation. CTR is usually performed under local anaesthesia, the application of which is often the most painful event during the procedure. One important aspect of patient satisfaction is adequate pain management during and after CTR. Long-acting local anaesthetics provide good postoperative pain control. Adjunct bicarbonate has been shown to reduce pain during injection of local anaesthetic and to prolong its analgesic effect. To date, no published randomised controlled trial has compared buffered to non-buffered long-acting local anaesthetic during CTR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will randomly assign 116 patients with CTS to receive buffered or non-buffered mixtures of lidocaine and bupivacaine with epinephrine before CTR. The primary outcome is overall pain experienced during the injection of local anaesthetic, assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale. The secondary outcomes are pain intensity from the injection and during CTR, use of painkillers and pain intensity every 4 hours until third postoperative night, symptom severity and functional status preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery, and patient-rated outcome measures at 3 months after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Savo Hospital District (2311/2021). The study will be performed according to the principles of good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results are expected to be presented in an international hand surgical conference and the manuscript to be sent to a hand surgery-orientated peer-reviewed journal during 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered to clinicaltrials.gov, study ID NCT05328180.

Indexed as

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalBicarbonatesHumansPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnesthetics, LocalBicarbonateshand & wristorthopaedic & trauma surgerysurgery

Identifiers

PMID37723109
PMCPMC10510898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.