ReviewTrends in cancer2024
Chemical-genetics refines transcription factor regulatory circuits.
Review in Trends in cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel patient-centered outcome in cancer care, days at home: a scoping review and guide for its future use.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Targeting menin in lysine methyltransferase 2A/nucleophosmin-mutated leukemia: A novel strategy from epigenetic dysregulation to clinical therapy (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Role of Neural Circuits in Cognitive Impairment.Neurochemical research · 2024Review
- Characterization of time toxicity in older patients with metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Mutant FOXO1 controls an oncogenic network via enhancer accessibility.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Pluripotency state transition of embryonic stem cells requires the turnover of histone chaperone FACT on chromatin.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptional dysregulation is a key step in oncogenesis, but our understanding of transcriptional control has relied on genetic approaches that are slow and allow for compensation. Chemical-genetic approaches have shortened the time frame for the analysis of transcription factors from days or weeks to minutes. These studies show that while DNA-binding proteins bind to thousands of sites, they are directly required to regulate only a small cadre of genes. Moreover, these transcriptional control networks are far more distinct, with much less overlap and interconnectivity than predicted from DNA binding. The identified direct targets can then be used to dissect the mechanism of action of these factors, which could identify ways to therapeutically manipulate these oncogenic transcriptional control networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.