Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37722859›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2023

Trends in consultations and prescribing for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: an electronic primary care records study.

Victoria K Welsh, Kayleigh J Mason, James Bailey, Ram Bajpai, Kelvin P Jordan, Christian D Mallen, Claire Burton

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Sociodemographic disparities in primary care management of back pain in children and young people: a population-based cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria K WelshCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0002-9156-5271
Kayleigh J MasonCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0002-5419-0669
James BaileyCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0002-2566-3527
Ram BajpaiCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0002-1227-2703
Kelvin P JordanCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0003-4748-5335
Christian D MallenCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-1028
Claire BurtonCentre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0003-4688-3075
Keele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are common and generally managed in primary care through supported self-care, physiotherapy, analgesia, and specialist referral where indicated. The COVID-19 pandemic led to abrupt changes in primary care delivery, including moves to remote consulting, pauses on group-based self-care, and restricted referrals.

aimTo describe how patterns of UK primary healthcare consultations and analgesic prescribing relating to RMDs changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN AND

settingObservational study using routinely collected national primary care electronic health record data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1 April 2017 and 1 October 2021.

methodRMD and analgesic SNOMED-CT codes were derived through consensus and published work. Prevalent and incident RMD-related consultations were determined, and RMD consultations matched to prevalent and incident analgesia prescriptions. Joinpoint regression was used to describe trends over time.

resultsPrevalent and incident RMD consultations steadily increased until March 2020 when a substantial drop occurred as pandemic- related restrictions were introduced; levels had not recovered to pre-pandemic highs by October 2021. While incident and prevalent analgesic prescribing also reduced around March 2020, the proportion of patients with an RMD consultation prescribed any analgesic increased from 27.72% in February 2020 to 38.15% in April 2020, with increases across all analgesic groups. A higher proportion of strong opioid prescriptions was seen in the most deprived areas.

conclusionPandemic-associated restrictions led to fewer primary care consultations and relative increases in analgesic prescribing, including strong opioids, for RMDs in the UK. Policymakers must consider the impact of these changes in future healthcare resource planning.

Indexed as

COVID-19Musculoskeletal DiseasesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidHumansMuscular DiseasesPainPandemicsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidanalgesiaCOVID-19 pandemicdrug prescribingmusculoskeletal diseasesmusculoskeletal painprimary care

Identifiers

PMID37722859
PMCPMC10523337
OpenAlexW4377824855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.