ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2024
Non-invasive estimation of left ventricular systolic peak pressure: a prerequisite to calculate myocardial work in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immature and mature myocardium in the pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the effect of mavacamten on left ventricular function in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using myocardial work.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2026Article
- Why the septum thickens in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Review
- Mavacamten optimizes myocardial work in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a non-invasive pressure-strain analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Evaluating left ventricular function and myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with corrected myocardial work.Echo research and practice · 2026Article
- Towards non-invasive assessment of myocardial work using myocardial stiffness and strain: a human pilot study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025Article
- Characterisation of interrelations among myocardial work parameters in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: differences between non-obstructive and obstructive disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Apical Sparing of Longitudinal Strain as a Specific Pattern of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: A Comparison between Deformation Imaging and Histological Findings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsMyocardial work (MyW) is an echocardiographically derived parameter to estimate myocardial performance. The calculation of MyW utilizes pressure strain loops from global longitudinal strain and brachial blood pressure (BP) as a surrogate of left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP). Since LVSP cannot be equated with BP in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), we explored whether LVSP can be derived non-invasively by combining Doppler gradients and BP. METHODS AND
resultsWe studied 20 consecutive patients (8 women, 12 men; mean age 57.0 ± 13.9 years; NYHA 2.1 ± 0.8; maximal septal thickness 24.7 ± 6.3 mm) with indication for first alcohol septal ablation. All measurements were performed simultaneously in the catheterization laboratory (CathLab)-invasively: ascending aortic and LV pressures; non-invasively: BP, maximal (CWmax) and mean (CWmean) Doppler gradients.LVSP was 188.9 ± 38.5 mmHg. Mean gradients of both methods were comparable (CathLab 34.3 ± 13.4 mmHg vs. CW 31.0 ± 13.7 mmHg). Maximal gradient was higher in echocardiography (64.5 ± 28.8 mmHg) compared with CathLab (54.8 ± 24.0 mmHg; P < 0.05). Adding BP (143.1 ± 20.6 mmHg) to CWmax resulted in higher (207.7 ± 38.0 mmHg; P < 0.001), whereas adding BP to CWmean in lower (174.1 ± 26.1 mmHg; P < 0.01) derived LVSP compared with measured LVSP. However, adding BP to averaged CWmax and CWmean resulted in comparable results for measured and derived LVSP (190.9 ± 31.6 mmHg) yielding a favourable correlation (r = 0.87, P < 0.001) and a good level of agreement in the Bland-Altman plot.
conclusionNon-invasive estimation of LVSP in HOCM is feasible by combining conventional BP and averaged CWmean and CWmax gradients. Hereby, a more reliable estimation of MyW in HOCM may be feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.