Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37722136›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2025

Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.

Jennifer C Cole, Ash J Gillis, Sander van der Linden, Mark A Cohen, Michael P Vandenbergh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Know Your Stripes? An Assessment of Climate Warming Stripes as a Graphical Risk Communication Format.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer C ColeClimate Change Research Network, Vanderbilt University.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-0597
Ash J GillisOwen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University.
Sander van der LindenDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge.
Mark A CohenOwen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University.
Michael P VandenberghClimate Change Research Network, Vanderbilt University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Political polarization is a barrier to enacting policy solutions to global issues. Social psychology has a rich history of studying polarization, and there is an important opportunity to define and refine its contributions to the present political realities. We do so in the context of one of the most pressing modern issues: climate change. We synthesize the literature on political polarization and its applications to climate change, and we propose lines of further research and intervention design. We focus on polarization in the United States, examining other countries when literature was available. The polarization literature emphasizes two types of mechanisms of political polarization: (1) individual-level psychological processes related to political ideology and (2) group-level psychological processes related to partisan identification. Interventions that address group-level processes can be more effective than those that address individual-level processes. Accordingly, we emphasize the promise of interventions leveraging superordinate identities, correcting misperceived norms, and having trusted leaders communicate about climate change. Behavioral interventions like these that are grounded in scientific research are one of our most promising tools to achieve the behavioral wedge that we need to address climate change and to make progress on other policy issues.

Indexed as

Climate ChangePoliticsHumansPsychology, SocialUnited Statesaffective polarizationclimate changeinterventionspolitical polarizationsocial identitiessocial norms

Identifiers

PMID37722136
PMCPMC11720282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.