ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2025
Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.
Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moral perspective-taking can reduce polarization around climate policy in the United States.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- A Psychological and Linguistic Analysis of "The 2024 State of the Climate Report: Perilous Times on Planet Earth".Bioscience · 2026Article
- Ideological polarization on anthropogenic climate change is stronger among politicians than among citizens across eight countries.Communications sustainability · 2026Article
- Know Your Stripes? An Assessment of Climate Warming Stripes as a Graphical Risk Communication Format.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
- Americans' multidimensional relationship with science: Is citizen science a path forward?PloS one · 2026Article
- Most Christian American religious leaders silently believe in climate change, and informing their congregation can help open dialogue.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Younger Americans are less politically polarized than older Americans about climate policies (but not about other policy domains).PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Political polarization is a barrier to enacting policy solutions to global issues. Social psychology has a rich history of studying polarization, and there is an important opportunity to define and refine its contributions to the present political realities. We do so in the context of one of the most pressing modern issues: climate change. We synthesize the literature on political polarization and its applications to climate change, and we propose lines of further research and intervention design. We focus on polarization in the United States, examining other countries when literature was available. The polarization literature emphasizes two types of mechanisms of political polarization: (1) individual-level psychological processes related to political ideology and (2) group-level psychological processes related to partisan identification. Interventions that address group-level processes can be more effective than those that address individual-level processes. Accordingly, we emphasize the promise of interventions leveraging superordinate identities, correcting misperceived norms, and having trusted leaders communicate about climate change. Behavioral interventions like these that are grounded in scientific research are one of our most promising tools to achieve the behavioral wedge that we need to address climate change and to make progress on other policy issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.