ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Maximizing multi-reaction dependencies provides more accurate and precise predictions of intracellular fluxes than the principle of parsimony.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accurate prediction of flux distributions compatible with metabolite concentration effects in genome-scale metabolic networks.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A constraint-based framework for exploring the impact of multireaction dependencies on metabolic functions.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Integrating Genome-Scale Metabolic Models with Patient Plasma Metabolome to Study Endothelial Metabolism In Situ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracellular fluxes represent a joint outcome of cellular transcription and translation and reflect the availability and usage of nutrients from the environment. While approaches from the constraint-based metabolic framework can accurately predict cellular phenotypes, such as growth and exchange rates with the environment, accurate prediction of intracellular fluxes remains a pressing problem. Parsimonious flux balance analysis (pFBA) has become an approach of choice to predict intracellular fluxes by employing the principle of efficient usage of protein resources. Nevertheless, comparative analyses of intracellular flux predictions from pFBA against fluxes estimated from labeling experiments remain scarce. Here, we posited that steady-state flux distributions derived from the principle of maximizing multi-reaction dependencies are of improved accuracy and precision than those resulting from pFBA. To this end, we designed a constraint-based approach, termed complex-balanced FBA (cbFBA), to predict steady-state flux distributions that support the given specific growth rate and exchange fluxes. We showed that the steady-state flux distributions resulting from cbFBA in comparison to pFBA show better agreement with experimentally measured fluxes from 17 Escherichia coli strains and are more precise, due to the smaller space of alternative solutions. We also showed that the same principle holds in eukaryotes by comparing the predictions of pFBA and cbFBA against experimentally derived steady-state flux distributions from 26 knock-out mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Furthermore, our results showed that intracellular fluxes predicted by cbFBA provide better support for the principle of minimizing metabolic adjustment between mutants and wild types. Together, our findings point that other principles that consider the dynamics and coordination of steady states may govern the distribution of intracellular fluxes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.