Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721931›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Comparative Analysis of Physical Examination, CT Scan, and Three-Dimensional Gait Analysis in Evaluating Lower Extremity Torsion Deformities in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Sheng Jin, Chunxin Xu, Haiqing Cai, Cen Chen, Yangyang Lu, Zhigang Wang, Min Shen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheng JinDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Chunxin XuThree-Dimensional Gait Analysis Laboratory, Shanghai Rehabilitation Center for Special Children, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Haiqing CaiDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Cen ChenThree-Dimensional Gait Analysis Laboratory, Shanghai Rehabilitation Center for Special Children, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Yangyang LuThree-Dimensional Gait Analysis Laboratory, Shanghai Rehabilitation Center for Special Children, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Zhigang WangDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Min ShenThree-Dimensional Gait Analysis Laboratory, Shanghai Rehabilitation Center for Special Children, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Shanghai Children's Medical Center · CNChildren's Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation and the accuracy of lower-extremity torsion deformities measured by physical examination, CT scan, and three-dimensional gait analysis in children with CP. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study group included 72 children with CP with lower-extremity torsion deformities. All subjects were assessed by: 1. physical examination: maximum internal rotation (MIR), maximum external rotation (MER) for hip joint torsion, and transmalleolar axis (TMA) for tibial torsion; 2. CT scanning: femoral anteversion (FAV) and tibial torsion (TT); 3. three-dimensional gait analysis kinematic parameters: single-support phase of femoral rotation, double-support phase of femoral rotation, swing phase of femoral rotation and single-support phase of tibial rotation, double-support phase of tibial rotation, and swing phase of tibial rotation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation test. A significance level of P<0.05 was set. RESULTS In femurs, MIR and MER were correlated with FAV, and the correlation of MER was higher, while physical examination and FAV were not correlated with any kinematic data in gait analysis. In tibias, there was no correlation between TMA and TT, but both TMA and TT were correlated with the gait analysis kinematic data, and the correlation of TT was higher. TMA was more correlated with tibial rotation during swing phase, while TT was more correlated with tibial rotation in single-support phase. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional gait analysis can analyze the tibial rotation of children with cerebral palsy, which is highly correlated with CT and physical examination. However, femoral rotation was not associated with CT and physical examination.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyGait AnalysisChildHumansLower ExtremityPhysical ExaminationTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37721931
PMCPMC10512746
OpenAlexW4385873578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.