ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Comparative Analysis of Physical Examination, CT Scan, and Three-Dimensional Gait Analysis in Evaluating Lower Extremity Torsion Deformities in Children with Cerebral Palsy.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of femoral de-rotation on lower limb alignment using patient-specific guides with reliance on EOS scan, a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Radiological assessment of lower limb torsional deformities: a narrative review.Annals of joint · 2025Review
- Epidemiology of Lower Limb Musculoskeletal Pathology in Cerebral Palsy: A Population-Based, Cohort Study.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation and the accuracy of lower-extremity torsion deformities measured by physical examination, CT scan, and three-dimensional gait analysis in children with CP. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study group included 72 children with CP with lower-extremity torsion deformities. All subjects were assessed by: 1. physical examination: maximum internal rotation (MIR), maximum external rotation (MER) for hip joint torsion, and transmalleolar axis (TMA) for tibial torsion; 2. CT scanning: femoral anteversion (FAV) and tibial torsion (TT); 3. three-dimensional gait analysis kinematic parameters: single-support phase of femoral rotation, double-support phase of femoral rotation, swing phase of femoral rotation and single-support phase of tibial rotation, double-support phase of tibial rotation, and swing phase of tibial rotation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation test. A significance level of P<0.05 was set. RESULTS In femurs, MIR and MER were correlated with FAV, and the correlation of MER was higher, while physical examination and FAV were not correlated with any kinematic data in gait analysis. In tibias, there was no correlation between TMA and TT, but both TMA and TT were correlated with the gait analysis kinematic data, and the correlation of TT was higher. TMA was more correlated with tibial rotation during swing phase, while TT was more correlated with tibial rotation in single-support phase. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional gait analysis can analyze the tibial rotation of children with cerebral palsy, which is highly correlated with CT and physical examination. However, femoral rotation was not associated with CT and physical examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.