ArticlePloS one2023
Simple Bayesian reconstruction and forecasting of stream water temperature for ecologists-A tool using air temperature, optionally flow, in a time series decomposition approach.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitigating the impacts of global warming on wildlife entails four practical steps. First, we need to study how processes of interest vary with temperature. Second, we need to build good temperature scenarios. Third, processes can be forecast accordingly. Only then can we perform the fourth step, testing mitigating measures. While having good temperature data is essential, this is not straightforward for stream ecologists and managers. Water temperature (WT) data are often short and incomplete and future projections are currently not routinely available. There is a need for generic models which address this data gap with good resolution and current models are partly lacking. Here, we expand a previously published hierarchical Bayesian model that was driven by air temperature (AT) and flow (Q) as a second covariate. The new model can hindcast and forecast WT time series at a daily time step. It also allows a better appraisal of real uncertainties in the warming of water temperatures in rivers compared to the previous version, stemming from its hybrid structure between time series decomposition and regression. This model decomposes all-time series using seasonal sinusoidal periodic signals and time varying means and amplitudes. It then links the contrasted frequency signals of WT (daily and six month) through regressions to that of AT and optionally Q for better resolution. We apply this model to two contrasting case study rivers. For one case study, AT only is available as a covariate. This expanded model further improves the already good fitting and predictive capabilities of its earlier version while additionally highlighting warming uncertainties. The code is available online and can easily be run for other temperate rivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.