Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721793›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2023

Telehealth and In-Person Behavioral Health Services in Rural Communities Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multisite Prospective Cohort Study.

Marcia M Ward, Fred Ullrich, Divya Bhagianadh, Eve-Lynn Nelson, James P Marcin, Knute D Carter, Kari Beth Law, Carly McCord, Jonathan Neufeld, Kimberly A S Merchant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marcia M WardDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-1302
Fred UllrichDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0726-1708
Divya BhagianadhSchool of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5169-1759
Eve-Lynn NelsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-9180
James P MarcinDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-6947
Knute D CarterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6710-4029
Kari Beth LawDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-7694
Carly McCordDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-4928
Jonathan NeufeldInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1673-1786
Kimberly A S MerchantDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-0542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic triggered widespread adjustments across the US health care system. Telehealth use showed a substantial increase in mental health conditions and services due to acute public health emergency (PHE) behavioral health needs on top of long-standing gaps in access to behavioral health services. How health systems that were already providing behavioral telehealth services adjusted services and staffing during this period has not been well documented, particularly in rural areas with chronic shortages of behavioral health providers and services.

objectiveThis study investigates patient and treatment characteristic changes from before the COVID-19 PHE to during the PHE within both telehealth and in-person behavioral health services provided in 95 rural communities across the United States.

methodsWe used a nonrandomized, prospective, multisite research design involving 2 active treatment groups. The telehealth cohort included all patients who initiated telehealth treatment regimens during the data collection period. A comparison group included a cohort of patients who initiated in-person treatment regimen. Patient enrollment occurred on a rolling basis, and data collection was extended for 3 months after treatment initiation for each patient. Chi-square tests compared changes from pre-PHE to PHE time periods within telehealth and in-person treatment cohorts. The dependent measures included patient diagnosis, clinicians providing treatment services, and type of treatment services provided at each encounter. The 4780 patients in the telehealth cohort and the 6457 patients in the in-person cohort had an average of 3.5 encounters during the 3-month follow-up period.

resultsThe encounters involving anxiety, dissociative, and stress-related disorders in the telehealth cohort increased from 30% (698/2352) in the pre-PHE period to 35% (4632/12,853) in the PHE period (P<.001), and encounters involving substance use disorders in the in-person cohort increased from 11% (468/4249) in the pre-PHE period to 18% (3048/17,047) in the PHE period (P<.001). The encounters involving treatment service codes for alcohol, drug, and medication-assisted therapy in the telehealth cohort increased from 1% (22/2352) in the pre-PHE period to 11% (1470/13,387) in the PHE period (P<.001); likewise, encounters for this type of service in the in-person cohort increased from 0% (0/4249) in the pre-PHE period to 16% (2687/17,047) in the PHE period (P<.001). From the pre-PHE to the PHE period, encounters involving 60-minute psychotherapy in the telehealth cohort increased from 8% (190/2352) to 14% (1802/13,387; P<.001), while encounters involving group therapy in the in-person cohort decreased from 12% (502/4249) to 4% (739/17,047; P<.001).

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic challenged health service providers, and they adjusted the way both telehealth and in-person behavioral therapy services were delivered. Looking forward, future research is needed to explicate the interaction of patient, provider, setting, and intervention factors that influenced the patterns observed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

anxietybehaviorbehavioral healthCOVID-19depressiondigital healtheHealthmental healthmHealthpandemicruralrural health servicestelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37721793
PMCPMC10508259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.