Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721770›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2023

3D-printed sheet jet for stable megahertz liquid sample delivery at X-ray free-electron lasers.

Patrick E Konold, Tong You, Johan Bielecki, Joana Valerio, Marco Kloos, Daniel Westphal, Alfredo Bellisario, Tej Varma Yenupuri, August Wollter, Jayanath C P Koliyadu and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Journal of applied crystallography · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Patrick E KonoldLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Tong YouLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan BieleckiEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.
Joana ValerioEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5931-0925
Marco KloosEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8745-9740
Daniel WestphalLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8735-0369
Alfredo BellisarioLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5155-4431
Tej Varma YenupuriLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
August WollterLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Jayanath C P KoliyaduEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0245-3842
Faisal H M KouaEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8371-9587
Romain LetrunEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0569-5193
Adam RoundEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0723-8228
Tokushi SatoEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3155-3487
Petra MészárosDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden.
Leonardo MonrroyDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8852-9424
Jennifer MutisyaDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden.
Szabolcs BódizsDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Taru LarkialaDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0004-4180-1311
Amke NimmrichDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0425-2101
Roberto AlvarezDepartment of Physics, Arizona State University, 550 E. Tyler Drive, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Patrick AdamsSchool of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Richard BeanEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869 Schenefeld, Germany.
Tomas EkebergLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0092-2104
Richard A KirianDepartment of Physics, Arizona State University, 550 E. Tyler Drive, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7197-3086
Andrew V MartinSchool of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Sebastian WestenhoffDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden.
Filipe R N C MaiaLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning CTS 19-227National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences DBI-1231306National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences DBI-1943448National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences MCB-1817862Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning ITM17-0455Vetenskapsrådet 2017-05336Vetenskapsrådet 2018-00234Vetenskapsrådet 2019-06092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) can probe chemical and biological reactions as they unfold with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. A principal challenge in this pursuit involves the delivery of samples to the X-ray interaction point in such a way that produces data of the highest possible quality and with maximal efficiency. This is hampered by intrinsic constraints posed by the light source and operation within a beamline environment. For liquid samples, the solution typically involves some form of high-speed liquid jet, capable of keeping up with the rate of X-ray pulses. However, conventional jets are not ideal because of radiation-induced explosions of the jet, as well as their cylindrical geometry combined with the X-ray pointing instability of many beamlines which causes the interaction volume to differ for every pulse. This complicates data analysis and contributes to measurement errors. An alternative geometry is a liquid sheet jet which, with its constant thickness over large areas, eliminates the problems related to X-ray pointing. Since liquid sheets can be made very thin, the radiation-induced explosion is reduced, boosting their stability. These are especially attractive for experiments which benefit from small interaction volumes such as fluctuation X-ray scattering and several types of spectroscopy. Although their use has increased for soft X-ray applications in recent years, there has not yet been wide-scale adoption at XFELs. Here, gas-accelerated liquid sheet jet sample injection is demonstrated at the European XFEL SPB/SFX nano focus beamline. Its performance relative to a conventional liquid jet is evaluated and superior performance across several key factors has been found. This includes a thickness profile ranging from hundreds of nanometres to 60 nm, a fourfold increase in background stability and favorable radiation-induced explosion dynamics at high repetition rates up to 1.13 MHz. Its minute thickness also suggests that ultrafast single-particle solution scattering is a possibility.

Indexed as

fast SAXfast WAXfree-electron lasersinjectorssample deliverysingle particlestime-resolved studiesXFELs

Identifiers

PMID37721770
PMCPMC10619454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.