Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721753›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Biomarker-Directed Therapy in Black and White Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Clara Hwang, Nicholas C Henderson, Shih-Chun Chu, Brandon Holland, Frank C Cackowski, Amanda Pilling, Albert Jang, Shoshana Rothstein, Matthew Labriola, Joseph J Park and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Clara HwangHenry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Nicholas C HendersonUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Shih-Chun ChuUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Brandon HollandWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Frank C CackowskiWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Amanda PillingHenry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Albert JangTulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Shoshana RothsteinWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Matthew LabriolaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Joseph J ParkUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Alyssa GhoseUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mehmet A BilenEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Seema MustafaEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Deepak KilariMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Michael J PierroMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Bicky ThapaMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Abhishek TripathiUniversity of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Rohan GarjeUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Aditya RavindraUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Vadim S KoshkinUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Erik HernandezUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Michael T SchweizerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Andrew J ArmstrongDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Rana R McKayUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Tanya B DorffCity of Hope, Duarte, California.
Ajjai S AlvaUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Pedro C BarataTulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USDuke Medical Center · USEmory University · USHenry Ford Health System · USTulane University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Iowa · USWayne State University · USCity of Hope · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Black men have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer. Whether precision oncology disparities affect Black men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. Objective: To compare precision medicine data and outcomes between Black and White men with mCRPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) consortium, a multi-institutional registry with linked clinicogenomic data, from April 2020 to December 2021. Participants included Black and White patients with mCRPC with molecular data. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to May 2023. Exposures: Database-reported race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the frequency of actionable molecular data, defined as the presence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), homologous recombination repair deficiency, or tumor mutational burden of 10 mutations per megabase or greater. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of other alterations, the type and timing of genomic testing performed, and use of targeted therapy. Efficacy outcomes were prostate-specific antigen response rate, site-reported radiographic response, and overall survival. Results: A total of 962 eligible patients with mCRPC were identified, including 204 Black patients (21.2%; median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 61 [55-67] years; 131 patients [64.2%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 92 patients [45.1%] with de novo metastatic disease) and 758 White patients (78.8%; median [IQR] age, 63 [57-69] years; 445 patients [58.7%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 310 patients [40.9%] with de novo metastatic disease). Median (IQR) follow-up from mCRPC was 26.6 (14.2-44.7) months. Blood-based molecular testing was more common in Black men (111 men [48.7%]) than White men (317 men [36.4%]; P < .001). Rates of actionable alterations were similar between groups (65 Black men [32.8%]; 215 White men [29.1%]; P = .35), but MMRD or MSI-H was more common in Black men (18 men [9.1]) than White men (36 men [4.9%]; P = .04). PTEN alterations were less frequent in Black men than White men (31 men [15.7%] vs 194 men [26.3%]; P = .003), as were TMPRSS alterations (14 men [7.1%] vs 155 men [21.0%]; P < .001). No other differences were seen in the 15 most frequently altered genes, including TP53, AR, CDK12, RB1, and PIK3CA. Matched targeted therapy was given less frequently in Black men than White men (22 men [33.5%] vs 115 men [53.5%]; P = .008). There were no differences in response to targeted therapy or survival between the two cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of men with mCRPC found higher frequency of MMRD or MSI-H and lower frequency of PTEN and TMPRSS alterations in Black men compared with White men. Although Black men received targeted therapy less frequently than White men, no differences were observed in clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedBiomarkers, TumorBlack or African AmericanHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesWhite PeopleBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID37721753
PMCPMC10507489
OpenAlexW4386817795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.