Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721703›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023

Evaluation of the corneal thickness and endothelial changes following uncomplicated phacoemulsification in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with pseudo-exfoliation syndrome by specular microscopy.

Mohamed Salah El-Din Mahmoud, Ismail Ahmed Nagib Omar, Heba Radi AttaAllah

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04965168 (Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium Following Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Specular Microscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04965168 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium Following Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Specular Microscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled61ConditionsPseudoexfoliationArmsphacoemulsification of the lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed Salah El-Din MahmoudOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University Hospital, Minia, Egypt.
Ismail Ahmed Nagib OmarOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University Hospital, Minia, Egypt.
Heba Radi AttaAllahOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University Hospital, Minia, Egypt. heba.ali@mu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6349-2706
Minia University Hospital · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate corneal endothelial cell changes following uncomplicated phacoemulsification in diabetic patients with PEX, compared with diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients with PEX.

methodsThis prospective, comparative, non-randomized cohort study included 61 eyes of 61 patients who were diagnosed as having senile cataract. Patients were divided into three groups: Group (1) included 19 eyes of patients with DM and PEX, group (2) included 22 eyes of diabetic patients, and group (3) included 20 eyes of patients with PEX. All included patients had uncomplicated phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. Patients were examined by non-contact specular microscopy (NIDEK, CEM-530, Japan), preoperatively and postoperatively at regular follow-up periods (one, three, and six months postoperatively) with analysis of the endothelial cell density, percentage of hexagonal cells, CV, and CCT.

resultsBy the end of follow-up period, there was a statistically significant reduction in ECD and HEX with a significant increase in CV and CCT in group one (DM-PEX). In group two (DM), a statistically significant decrease in ECD and HEX with a significant increase in CCT was reported, while in group three (PEX), the only significant difference was found in the form of ECD reduction.

conclusionPatients with DM and PEX had significant changes regarding ECD, CV, HEX, and CCT which were more pronounced than in patients with DM only or PEX only. More attention should be paid while operating on diabetic patients with PEX to save corneal endothelium and decrease postoperative complications. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was retrospectively registered (16 July 2021) on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04965168).

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusExfoliation SyndromePhacoemulsificationCell CountCohort StudiesEndothelium, CornealHumansMicroscopyProspective StudiesCorneal endotheliumDiabetes mellitusPhacoemulsificationPseudo-exfoliation syndromeSpecular microscopy

Identifiers

PMID37721703
OpenAlexW4386818364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.