Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721627›Full record

Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2023

Treatment of Complications After Minimally Invasive Breast Augmentation with Aquafilling Gel.

Piotr Gierej, Ewa Woźniak-Roszkowska, Marcin Radziszewski, Jakub Miszczyk, Natalia Krześniak, Bartłomiej Noszczyk

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Aquafilling Filler for Buttock Augmentation Cause Severe Long-Term Complications: A Case Report.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piotr GierejDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. W. Orłowski Memorial Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.
Ewa Woźniak-RoszkowskaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. W. Orłowski Memorial Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin RadziszewskiFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091, Warsaw, Poland. marcinradziszewski00@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-3099
Jakub MiszczykDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. W. Orłowski Memorial Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.
Natalia KrześniakDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. W. Orłowski Memorial Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.
Bartłomiej NoszczykDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. W. Orłowski Memorial Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent studies have revealed that Aquafilling gel used for breast augmentation causes complications. In this study, we investigated which surgical approach should be used to treat these complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis observational cohort study analysed the data of 31 women suffering from complications after breast enlargement with Aquafilling injection who were treated at our department in 2016-2021. Patients underwent either conservative or radical surgery. GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for data processing.

resultsApproximately 88.89% of patients after conservative surgery required reoperation, while only 22.73% of patients treated radically needed revision surgery. Every patient who underwent an attempt to remove the gel via needle prior to admission required surgery. Seventy-five per cent of them had positive culture swabs, whereas only 26.09% of patients who did not undergo needle aspiration had positive cultures. A positive correlation between the volume of injected filler and the number of symptoms was observed.

conclusionsIn addition to irrigation and drainage, Aquafilling removal should include infiltrated tissue excision during primary surgery. Moreover, needle aspiration of the filler is ineffective, and it may lead to a gel infection. Furthermore, the more filler is injected, the higher the number of complications observed. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsMammaplastyCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAquafilling fillerBreast augmentationComplications

Identifiers

PMID37721627
OpenAlexW4386817651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.