Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721598›Full record

ArticlePlanta2023

Manual correction of genome annotation improved alternative splicing identification of Artemisia annua.

Zhaoyu Liu, Yupeng Du, Zhihao Sun, Bohan Cheng, Zenghao Bi, Zhicheng Yao, Yuting Liang, Huiling Zhang, Run Yao, Shen Kang and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of Alternative Artemisinin Production Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Zhaoyu Liu *School of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300193, China.
Yupeng Du *College of Life Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China.
Zhihao SunInstitute of Herbgenomics, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
Bohan ChengInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Zenghao BiInstitute of Herbgenomics, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
Zhicheng YaoSchool of Information Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen, 333403, China.
Yuting LiangInstitute of Herbgenomics, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
Huiling ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Run YaoInstitute of Herbgenomics, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
Shen KangInstitute of Herbgenomics, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
Yuhua ShiInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Huihua WanKey Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Dou QinPrescription Laboratory of Xinjiang Traditional Uyghur Medicine, Xinjiang Institute of Traditional Uyghur Medicine, Urmuqi, 830000, China.
Li XiangInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China. lxiang@icmm.ac.cn.
Liang LengInstitute of Herbgenomics, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China. lling@cdutcm.edu.cn.
Shilin ChenSchool of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300193, China. slchen@cdutcm.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2019YFE0108700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene annotation is essential for genome-based studies. However, algorithm-based genome annotation is difficult to fully and correctly reveal genomic information, especially for species with complex genomes. Artemisia annua L. is the only commercial resource of artemisinin production though the content of artemisinin is still to be improved. Genome-based genetic modification and breeding are useful strategies to boost artemisinin content and therefore, ensure the supply of artemisinin and reduce costs, but better gene annotation is urgently needed. In this study, we manually corrected the newly released genome annotation of A. annua using second- and third-generation transcriptome data. We found that incorrect gene information may lead to differences in structural, functional, and expression levels compared to the original expectations. We also identified alternative splicing events and found that genome annotation information impacted identifying alternative splicing genes. We further demonstrated that genome annotation information and alternative splicing could affect gene expression estimation and gene function prediction. Finally, we provided a valuable version of A. annua genome annotation and demonstrated the importance of gene annotation in future research.

Indexed as

Artemisia annuaArtemisininsAlternative SplicingGenomicsPlant BreedingartemisininArtemisininsAlternative splicingArtemisia annuaArtemisininGenome annotationManual correction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.