Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721584›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

The green and sustainable radiology department.

Jeffrey Mariampillai, Andrea Rockall, Christine Manuellian, Sara Cartwright, Samuel Taylor, Michael Deng, Sarah Sheard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond green: sustainability in nuclear medicine practice.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Estimation of carbon footprint in nuclear medicine: illustration of a french department.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeffrey MariampillaiHammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS, London, UK. j.mariampillai@nhs.net.
Andrea RockallClinical Chair of Radiology, Department of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.rockall@imperial.ac.uk.
Christine Manuellian
Sara Cartwright
Samuel Taylor
Michael Deng
Sarah Sheard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As manmade climate change threatens the health of the planet, it is important that we understand and address the contribution of healthcare to global emissions. Medical imaging is a significant contributor to overall emissions. This article aims to highlight key issues and examples of sustainable practices, in order to empower radiologists to make a change within their department.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeRadiologyHealth FacilitiesHospital DepartmentsHumansRadiologistsCircular economyDecarbonisingGreening radiologyScope 3Sustainability

Identifiers

PMID37721584
PMCPMC10689521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.