Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721574›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2023

[Secondary surgical procedures following motor nerve injuries].

Johannes Heinzel, Cosima Prahm, Henrik Lauer, Adrien Daigeler, Helene Hurth, Martin Schuhmann, Jonas Kolbenschlag

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes HeinzelKlinik für Hand‑, Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Verbrennungschirurgie, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. jheinzel@bgu-tuebingen.de.
Cosima PrahmKlinik für Hand‑, Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Verbrennungschirurgie, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Henrik LauerKlinik für Hand‑, Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Verbrennungschirurgie, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Adrien DaigelerKlinik für Hand‑, Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Verbrennungschirurgie, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Helene HurthKlinik für Neurochirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076.
Martin SchuhmannKlinik für Neurochirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076.
Jonas KolbenschlagKlinik für Neurochirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076.
University of Tübingen · DEBG Klinik Tübingen · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe functional deficits that develop after a peripheral nerve injury mean a considerable reduction in the quality of life for the affected patients. However, interventions on the injured nerve are not always possible or effective. In this case, secondary procedures, e.g. tendon transfers, are a feasible option for functional reconstruction.

objectivesAn overview of the most common secondary surgical procedures for functional reconstruction after peripheral nerve injuries.

methodsPresentation and discussion of the most common secondary surgical procedures with emphasis on tendon transfers. Illustration of the primary functions that need to be reconstructed depending on the respective nerve lesion.

resultsThe basic principle of secondary surgical procedures after nerve injuries is the transposition of a healthy tendomuscular unit to replace a lost function following a loss of muscle or tendon or if an intervention on the nerve is not promising. For example, by transferring flexor forearm muscles, wrist, finger and thumb extension can be reconstructed after radial nerve injury. By transposing the tibialis posterior muscle, dorsiflexion in the talocrural joint can be restored to enable the affected patient to walk safely without an orthosis.

conclusionsSecondary surgical procedures are a valuable option for functional reconstruction after nerve injury.

Indexed as

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesQuality of LifeFingersHumansRadial NerveTendon TransferExtremity reconstructionFunctional reconstructionPeripheral nerves/lesionTendon transferWinged scapula

Identifiers

PMID37721574
OpenAlexW4386818362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.