Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721502›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2023

Kill rate as a tool in efficiency evaluation of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) mass reared on factitious food.

Sauro Simoni, Giovanni Burgio, Franca Tarchi, Silvia Guidi, Donatella Goggioli, Elena Gagnarli, Francesco Turillazzi, Alberto Lanzoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sauro SimoniCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC), Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2396-2344
Giovanni BurgioDepartment of Agricultural and FoodSciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Franca TarchiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC), Florence, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-2209-5887
Silvia GuidiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC), Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3752-8322
Donatella GoggioliCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC), Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9487-7975
Elena GagnarliCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC), Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7088-6781
Francesco TurillazziCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC), Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2397-9250
Alberto LanzoniDepartment of Agricultural and FoodSciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8898-200X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predatory mites of the Phytoseiidae family are crucial biological control agents widely utilized in biological pest management targeting phytophagous mites and insects. Key factors in these control strategies are that phytoseiids must be able to find their main target prey and to maintain high populations and efficacy. To reduce expenses and time-consuming production methods of mass rearing of phytoseiids, pollen and other factitious (i.e., non-natural/nontarget) hosts need to be present as an alternative food for predatory mite populations. The mass-rearing possibilities of these predators on alternative food sources, such as astigmatid mites (i.e., house and stored mites) and pollen, must be evaluated not only by the cost of rearing settings but on the basis of their efficiency maintenance in killing prey. The pest kill rate (km) is the average daily lifetime killing of the pest by the natural enemy under consideration and can represent a useful indicator for phytoseiids efficacy to rank them as BCAs on the basis of their effective killing/predation on target prey. In this study, we evidenced that 2 astigmatid mites, Glycyphagus domesticus (De Geer) and Lepidoglyphus destructor (Schrank), and Quercus ilex L. pollen can be successfully adopted as substitute food sources for mass rearing of the phytoseiid Neoseiulus californicus (MgGregor); then, we determined that these populations of BCAs maintained a consistent km at new/first impact on the main target pest, Tetranychus urticae Koch.

Indexed as

AcariQuercusAnimalsBiological Control AgentsFoodPollenPredatory BehaviorBiological Control AgentsGlycyphagus domesticusLepidoglyphus destructorNeoseiulus californicusQuercus sp. pollen

Identifiers

PMID37721502
PMCPMC10506452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.