Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37721285›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2024

Neurophysiological, histological, and behavioral characterization of animal models of distraction spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Bo Han, Weishi Liang, Yong Hai, Duan Sun, Hongtao Ding, Yihan Yang, Peng Yin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bo HanDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Weishi LiangDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yong HaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Duan SunDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hongtao DingDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yihan YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Peng YinDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distraction spinal cord injury is caused by some degree of distraction or longitudinal tension on the spinal cord and commonly occurs in patients who undergo corrective operation for severe spinal deformity. With the increased degree and duration of distraction, spinal cord injuries become more serious in terms of their neurophysiology, histology, and behavior. Very few studies have been published on the specific characteristics of distraction spinal cord injury. In this study, we systematically review 22 related studies involving animal models of distraction spinal cord injury, focusing particularly on the neurophysiological, histological, and behavioral characteristics of this disease. In addition, we summarize the mechanisms underlying primary and secondary injuries caused by distraction spinal cord injury and clarify the effects of different degrees and durations of distraction on the primary injuries associated with spinal cord injury. We provide new concepts for the establishment of a model of distraction spinal cord injury and related basic research, and provide reference guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Indexed as

animal modelsbehaviordistractionheterogeneityhistologymechanismneurophysiologyspinal cord injurysystematic reviewtension

Identifiers

PMID37721285
PMCPMC10581570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.