Spinal intradural electrodes: opportunities, challenges and translation to the clinic.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Quantum Mechanical Mechanisms in the Therapeutic Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Quantum Computational Model.Journal of pain research · 2026
   Article
2. Functional motor mapping of domestic pig lumbar spinal cord using penetrating microelectrodes.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
   Article
3. Daily electric field treatment improves functional outcomes after thoracic contusion spinal cord injury in rats.Nature communications · 2025
   Article
4. Design considerations for optogenetic applications of soft micro-LED-based device systems across diverse nervous systems.Bioactive materials · 2025
   Review
5. Generation of direct current electrical fields as regenerative therapy for spinal cord injury: A review.APL bioengineering · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.