ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2024
Clinical and genetic characterisation of a large Indian congenital myasthenic syndrome cohort.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Variability and Genotype-Driven Outcomes in CHRND-Related Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- AGRN-, LRP4-, MUSK-Related CMS: Clinical, Neurophysiological, Morphological, Genetic and Pathological Mechanisms.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Review of Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome Caused by Pathogenic Variants in GFPT1.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Systematic reanalysis of next-generation sequencing data in 101 neuromuscular disorder families enhances diagnostic yield, reveals intronic variants, and identifies a novel disease gene.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Congenital myasthenic syndromes in a Southeast Asian adult neurology clinic: a long road to diagnosis and therapy.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to novelJournal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Global developmental delay and focal seizures in individuals with de novo truncating MACF1 variants.Human genomics · 2026Article
- A clinical and genotype-phenotype analysis of MACF1 variants.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Domain specific phenotypic expansion associated with variants inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Review of 40 genes causing congenital myasthenic syndromes.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- A Multifaceted Giant Protein Microtubule-Actin Cross-Linking Factor 1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Congenital myasthenic syndromes in adults: clinical features, diagnosis and long-term prognosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- DOK7 congenital myasthenic syndrome: case series and review of literature.BMC neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a rare group of inherited disorders caused by gene defects associated with the neuromuscular junction and potentially treatable with commonly available medications such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and β2 adrenergic receptor agonists. In this study, we identified and genetically characterized the largest cohort of CMS patients from India to date. Genetic testing of clinically suspected patients evaluated in a South Indian hospital during the period 2014-19 was carried out by standard diagnostic gene panel testing or using a two-step method that included hotspot screening followed by whole-exome sequencing. In total, 156 genetically diagnosed patients (141 families) were characterized and the mutational spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation described. Overall, 87 males and 69 females were evaluated, with the age of onset ranging from congenital to fourth decade (mean 6.6 ± 9.8 years). The mean age at diagnosis was 19 ± 12.8 (1-56 years), with a mean diagnostic delay of 12.5 ± 9.9 (0-49 years). Disease-causing variants in 17 CMS-associated genes were identified in 132 families (93.6%), while in nine families (6.4%), variants in genes not associated with CMS were found. Overall, postsynaptic defects were most common (62.4%), followed by glycosylation defects (21.3%), synaptic basal lamina genes (4.3%) and presynaptic defects (2.8%). Other genes found to cause neuromuscular junction defects (DES, TEFM) in our cohort accounted for 2.8%. Among the individual CMS genes, the most commonly affected gene was CHRNE (39.4%), followed by DOK7 (14.4%), DPAGT1 (9.8%), GFPT1 (7.6%), MUSK (6.1%), GMPPB (5.3%) and COLQ (4.5%). We identified 22 recurrent variants in this study, out of which eight were found to be geographically specific to the Indian subcontinent. Apart from the known common CHRNE variants p.E443Kfs*64 (11.4%) and DOK7 p.A378Sfs*30 (9.3%), we identified seven novel recurrent variants specific to this cohort, including DPAGT1 p.T380I and DES c.1023+5G>A, for which founder haplotypes are suspected. This study highlights the geographic differences in the frequencies of various causative CMS genes and underlines the increasing significance of glycosylation genes (DPAGT1, GFPT1 and GMPPB) as a cause of neuromuscular junction defects. Myopathy and muscular dystrophy genes such as GMPPB and DES, presenting as gradually progressive limb girdle CMS, expand the phenotypic spectrum. The novel genes MACF1 and TEFM identified in this cohort add to the expanding list of genes with new mechanisms causing neuromuscular junction defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.