ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2023
Reliability and validity of the supine-to-stand test in people with stroke.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06790992 (Relıabılıty and valıdıty of the supıne-to-stand Test as a Measure of Functional Motor Competence ın People wıth Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Relıabılıty and valıdıty of the supıne-to-stand Test as a Measure of Functional Motor Competence ın People wıth Multiple Sclerosis
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability and validity of the supine-to-stand test in patients with Parkinson's disease.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Relationship of Supine-to-stand Time and Bed Rise Quality with Trunk Control and Balance Among Post-stroke Survivors: A Cross-sectional Study.Annals of neurosciences · 2025Article
- Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of 21-item Fall Risk Index for community-dwelling older adults with stroke.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the psychometric properties of the supine-to-stand test in people with stroke.
designCross-sectional design. SUBJECTS: Fifty-two people with stroke (mean (standard deviation) age 63.13 (6.09) years; time post-stroke 93.13 (61.36) months) and 49 healthy older adults (61.90 (7.29) months).
methodsSubjects with stroke were recruited from the community dwelling in Hong Kong and assessed with the supineto- stand test, Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, ankle muscle strength test, Berg Balance Scale, limit of stability test, Timed Up-and-Go Test, Six-Minute Walk Test, Chinese version of Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Community Integration Measure (CIM-C), and 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) in a university-based rehabilitation laboratory.
resultsThe supine-to-stand test completion time demonstrated excellent intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.946-1.000) for the people with stroke. The completion time was significantly negatively correlated with Berg Balance Scale, Six-Minute Walk Test, limit of stability - maximal excursion, and limit of stability - endpoint excursion results (r = -0.391 to -0.507), whereas it was positively correlated with the Timed Up-and-Go test results (r = 0.461). The optimal cut-off supine-to-stand test completion time of 5.25 s is feasible for a clinical measure to distinguish the performance of people with stroke from healthy older adults (area under the curve = 0.852, sensitivity = 81.1%, specificity = 84.0%).
conclusionThe supine-to-stand test is a reliable, sensitive, specific and easy-to-administer clinical test for assessing the supine-to-stand ability of people with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.