ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2023
Sex and dose rate effects in automated cytogenetics.
Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological effects of conventional and ultra high dose rate radiation in human cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- No specific impact of ultra-high dose rates on radiation-induced chromosome rearrangements.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Long-term Radiation Signal Persistence in Urine and Blood: A Two-year Analysis in Non-human Primates Exposed to a 4 Gy Total-Body Gamma-Radiation Dose.Radiation research · 2025Article
- Beam intensity and stability control on a modified clinical linear accelerator for FLASH irradiation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- VHEE FLASH sparing effect measured at CLEAR, CERN with DNA damage of pBR322 plasmid as a biological endpoint.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- RABiT-III: an Automated Micronucleus Assay at a Non-Specialized Biodosimetry Facility.Radiation research · 2024Article
- Variable Dose Rates in Realistic Radiation Exposures: Effects on Small Molecule Markers of Ionizing Radiation in the Murine Model.Radiation research · 2023Article
- Validation of a High-Throughput Dicentric Chromosome Assay Using Complex Radiation Exposures.Radiation research · 2023Article
- Ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiator at the radiological research accelerator facility.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A machine learning method for improving the accuracy of radiation biodosimetry by combining data from the dicentric chromosomes and micronucleus assays.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Testing and validation of biodosimetry assays is routinely performed using conventional dose rate irradiation platforms, at a dose rate of approximately 1 Gy/min. In contrast, the exposures from an improvised nuclear device will be delivered over a large range of dose rates with a prompt irradiation component, delivered in less than 1 μs, and a protracted component delivered over hours and days. We present preliminary data from a large demographic study we have undertaken for investigation of age, sex and dose rate effects on dicentric and micronucleus yields. Our data demonstrate reduced dicentric and micronucleus yields at very high dose rates. Additionally, we have seen small differences between males and females, with males having slightly fewer micronuclei and slightly more dicentrics than females, at high doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.