Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720816›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2023

Female sexual medicine: an assessment of medical school curricula in a major United States city.

Nicolette Codispoti, Olivia Negris, Monica C Myers, Anna Petersen, Elsa Nico, Jennifer P Romanello, Rachel S Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolette CodispotiStritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-7329
Olivia NegrisRush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Monica C MyersChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL 60064, United States.
Anna PetersenRush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Elsa NicoUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Jennifer P RomanelloRush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Rachel S RubinMedstar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Urology, Washington, DC 20007, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although approximately 41% of women experience sexual dysfunction, limited education on female sexual medicine (FSM) in medical school results in underpreparedness among physicians when addressing these bothersome conditions. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the extent to which FSM is represented in medical education by examining current preclinical and clinical curricula. Methods: Preclinical curriculum materials on female sexual anatomy, physiology, and pathology, as well as obstetrics and gynecology clinical materials (syllabi, lecture materials, and supplemental resources), were collected from medical schools in the Chicago area. We utilized previous literature to identify specific components of medical school content to evaluate. Outcomes: Upon reviewing each institution's curricula, we evaluated materials for topic saturation and assessed goals of each syllabus in terms of required content. Results: Curriculum materials were collected from 7 medical schools. In the preclinical assessment, 1 institution identified all anatomic components of the clitoris in our review, 4 discussed the physiology of the female orgasm, 3 highlighted the prevalence and epidemiology of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), 3 addressed treatments for FSD, and 1 instructed a genitourinary physical exam specific to assessing FSD. When assessing obstetrics and gynecology clinical materials, 5 institutions included topics related to FSM. Of these, only 1 institution had corresponding required synchronous clerkship time dedicated to these topics as a 1-hour lecture, in addition to an optional online training to third-year clinical students in comprehensive sexual history-taking practices, including screening for FSD. One other institution offered supplemental case-based gynecology modules including vulvovaginal diseases and chronic pelvic pain, though sexual pleasure, arousal, and libido were not included. Clinical Implications: The results of this study highlight the need for the inclusion of standardized curricula related to FSM in medical education to equip future physicians to treat patients with sexual dysfunction. Strengths and Limitations: The strengths of this study include that it is the first of its kind to complete a comprehensive review of FSM curricula at a cohort of undergraduate medical institutions. Its limitations include a small sample size of 7 medical schools limited to 1 geographical area. Conclusion: Our focused needs assessment of medical schools in the Chicago area reveals inconsistencies in outlined institution-specific course goals related to FSM and thus highlights the need for restructuring the curricula to prepare future physicians to recognize and treat patients with sexual dysfunction.

Indexed as

curricular assessmentfemale sexual dysfunctionmedical education

Identifiers

PMID37720816
PMCPMC10501464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.