ArticleACS omega2023
Research on the Optimization for Acidification Modification Scheme Considering Coal's Wettability Based on the AHP-TOPSIS Method.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acidification technology is an important measure for enhancing the extraction of coalbed methane from seams with low permeability and abundant minerals, and the acidification scheme is the key to the success of acidification treatment. To determine the optimal acidification modification scheme, an improved AHP-TOPSIS method is proposed to decide on the optimal conditions for wettability modification. This method constructs an evaluation index system, taking the wettability of coal as the target layer and the pro/hydrophobic functional groups in coal as the index layer. Meanwhile, it innovatively takes the adsorption energy of each functional group when absorbing a single water molecule as the basis for assigning weights to the evaluation indexes. Then, nine acidification modification schemes are evaluated and selected by the improved AHP-TOPSIS method based on the test results of different schemes to get the optimal one. The optimal scheme selected by the AHP-TOPSIS method is validated by water adsorption tests and isothermal adsorption tests. The results showed that the significance of each evaluation index is ranked as follows: aromatic structures > hydroxyl groups > aliphatic functional groups > oxygen-containing functional groups. The optimal acidification modification scheme is selected by the AHP-TOPSIS method with a HF concentration of 4% and a reaction time of 6 h. The ranking of acidification modification schemes obtained by the AHP-TOPSIS method is in high agreement with the ranking of water adsorption tests. When compared with raw coal, the coal samples treated with the optimal scheme have lower adsorption capacity for gas, which indicates that the aforementioned method could be used to evaluate and select the optimal acidification modification scheme, and the selected optimal scheme has the potential to increase the output of coalbed methane.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.