Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720695›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2023

Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study.

Evelyn A Huhn, Christian S Göbl, Thorsten Fischer, Monya Todesco Bernasconi, Martina Kreft, Mirjam Kunze, Deborah R Vogt, Eva Dölzlmüller, Heidi Jaksch-Bogensperger, Sandra Heldstab and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02035059 (Predictability of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in First and Second Trimester, Using Novel Biomarkers, and the Development of New Biomarkers by Quantitative Proteomic Analysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02035059 completednot on this map

Predictability of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in First and Second Trimester, Using Novel Biomarkers, and the Development of New Biomarkers by Quantitative Proteomic Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2014 to 2018Enrolled820ConditionsPregnancy, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Evelyn A HuhnDepartment of Feto-Maternal Medicine and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5382-1353
Christian S GöblDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thorsten FischerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Salzburger Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Monya Todesco BernasconiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Martina KreftDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mirjam KunzeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Deborah R VogtDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0668-5675
Eva DölzlmüllerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Salzburger Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Heidi Jaksch-BogenspergerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Salzburger Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Sandra HeldstabDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Wolfgang EppelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter HussleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicole Ochsenbein KölbleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anne RichterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elke BäzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Bettina WinzelerDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Irene HoesliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictability of gestational diabetes mellitus wth a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in early pregnancy, based on the 2013 criteria of the World Health Organization, and to test newly proposed cut-off values. Design: International, prospective, multicentre cohort study. Setting: Six university or cantonal departments in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, from 1 May 2016 to 31 January 2019. Participants: Low risk cohort of 829 participants aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies attending first trimester screening and consenting to have an early 75 g OGTT at 12-15 weeks of gestation. Participants and healthcare providers were blinded to the results. Main outcome measures: Fasting, one hour, and two hour plasma glucose concentrations after an early 75 g OGTT (12-15 weeks of gestation) and a late 75 g OGTT (24-28 weeks of gestation). Results: Of 636 participants, 74 (12%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus, according to World Health Organization 2013 criteria, at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Applying WHO 2013 criteria to the early OGTT with at least one abnormal value gave a low sensitivity of 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.47), high specificity of 0.96 (0.95 to 0.98), positive predictive value of 0.57 (0.41 to 0.71), negative predictive value of 0.92 (0.89 to 0.94), positive likelihood ratio of 10.46 (6.21 to 17.63), negative likelihood ratio of 0.65 (0.55 to 0.78), and diagnostic odds ratio of 15.98 (8.38 to 30.47). Lowering the postload glucose values (75 g OGTT cut-off values of 5.1, 8.9, and 7.8 mmol/L) improved the detection rate (53%, 95% confidence interval 41% to 64%) and negative predictive value (0.94, 0.91 to 0.95), but decreased the specificity (0.91, 0.88 to 0.93) and positive predictive value (0.42, 0.32 to 0.53) at a false positive rate of 9% (positive likelihood ratio 5.59, 4.0 to 7.81; negative likelihood ratio 0.64, 0.52 to 0.77; and diagnostic odds ratio 10.07, 6.26 to 18.31). Conclusions: The results of this prospective low risk cohort study indicated that the 75 g OGTT as a screening tool in early pregnancy is not sensitive enough when applying WHO 2013 criteria. Postload glucose values were higher in early pregnancy complicated by diabetes in pregnancy. Lowering the postload cut-off values identified a high risk group for later development of gestational diabetes mellitus or those who might benefit from earlier treatment. Results from randomised controlled trials showing a beneficial effect of early intervention are unclear. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02035059.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusPregnancy complicationsPrenatal carePrenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID37720695
PMCPMC10503330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.