Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Similarities and differences between CLASS and ECERS-R estimates of educational environment quality.

Daria Bukhalenkova, Olga Almazova, Margarita Aslanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daria BukhalenkovaDepartment of Educational Psychology and Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Olga AlmazovaDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Margarita AslanovaDepartment of Educational Psychology and Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conducted research was devoted to comparison of kindergartens' educational environment quality evaluation via ECERS-R and CLASS methods. Both methods were applied in the same kindergarten groups. Therefore, in this study we attempted to find out if the educational environment quality assessments acquired via the two methods mentioned above would coincide. We analyzed the results from the cultural-historical psychology perspective. The educational environment quality assessment has been conducted in 83 Moscow kindergarten groups where study 5 to7 years old preschoolers. The correlation analysis results show that the ECERS-R method subscales are not related to the "Emotional support" CLASS domain, however, a significant correlation with the total ECERS-R score has been revealed. The "Classroom Organization" CLASS domain has the highest number of correlations to the ECERS-R subscales (4) as well as to the total ECERS-R score. The "Instructional Support" domain is connected only to the Parents and Staff subscale within the ECERS-R method. As a result of comparing groups with relatively low and high quality of the educational environment, that were identified based on the evaluation via the ECERS-R and CLASS methods, a good agreement between the results has been revealed. However, a fairly large number of groups with high CLASS scores have made it to the pool of average-low ECERS-R scores, which demonstrates a non-linear connection between the educational environment quality evaluations according to these two methods. Research allows to conclude that the ECERS-R and CLASS approaches complement each other well.

Indexed as

CLASSearly care and education qualityECERS-Rkindergarten qualitylearning environmentpreschool age

Identifiers

PMID37720636
PMCPMC10501724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.