Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720564›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2023

Evaluation of omadacycline against intracellular

S Jahanbakhsh, J Howland, M O Ndayishimiye Uwineza, M T Thwaites, C M Pillar, A W Serio, D M Anastasiou, D A Hufnagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of tetracyclines for nontuberculous mycobacteria: focus on rapidly growing mycobacteria.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Zebrafish larvae swim bladder serves as a model to studyMycobacteria (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S JahanbakhshMicrobiologics Antibiotic and Microbiome Research Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
J HowlandMicrobiologics Antibiotic and Microbiome Research Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
M O Ndayishimiye UwinezaMicrobiologics Antibiotic and Microbiome Research Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
M T ThwaitesMicrobiologics Antibiotic and Microbiome Research Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
C M PillarMicrobiologics Antibiotic and Microbiome Research Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
A W SerioParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.
D M AnastasiouParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.
D A HufnagelMicrobiologics Antibiotic and Microbiome Research Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic in the tetracycline class that was approved by the US FDA in 2018 for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. It is available in both IV and oral formulations. Omadacycline has broad-spectrum Objectives: To determine if omadacycline has intracellular antimicrobial activity against NTM, bacteria that can cause chronic lung disease, in an Methods: Two strains of Results: At 16 ×  the MIC at 72 h, omadacycline treatment of intracellular NTM yielded a log Conclusions: Omadacycline displayed intracellular activity against

Identifiers

PMID37720564
PMCPMC10502775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.