Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720528›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Efficacy and safety of temozolomide in the treatment of aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumours in Spain.

Cristina Lamas, Rosa Cámara, Carmen Fajardo, Pablo Remon-Ruiz, Betina Biagetti, Fernando Guerrero-Pérez, Marta Araujo-Castro, Mireia Mora, Felicia Hanzu, Pedro Iglesias and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cristina LamasEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Rosa CámaraEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen FajardoEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Spain.
Pablo Remon-RuizEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Betina BiagettiEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Fernando Guerrero-PérezEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Marta Araujo-CastroEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Mireia MoraEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Felicia HanzuEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro IglesiasEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain.
Rogelio García-CentenoEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso SotoEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend temozolomide as the first-line chemotherapy for aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumours. However, no clinical trials have been conducted to date and clinical experience is quite limited. We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients (9 women and 19 men), aged 46.6 + 16.9, with aggressive pituitary tumours (4 pituitary carcinomas and 24 aggressive adenomas) treated with temozolomide in 10 Spanish pituitary reference centres. Four patients had Cushing's disease, 9 prolactinomas and 15 clinically non-functioning pituitary tumours (seven silent corticotroph, three silent somatotroph, one silent lactotroph, one silent gondotroph and three null-cell tumours). Median size at diagnosis was 10.5 cm3 (IQR 4.7-22.5), with cavernous sinus invasion in 88% and no metastases. Pre-temozolomide treatment, these data were 5.2 cm3 (IQR 1.9-12.3), 89.3% and 14.3% (2 intracranial and 2 spinal metastases). All patients had undergone surgery (1-5 surgeries), 25 (89.3%) had received radiotherapy (7 of them reirradiated) and 13(46.4%) had received cabergoline. One patient interrupted temozolomide prematurely. The remaining 27 patients received a median of 13 cycles (range 3-66) of 5 days every 28 days, with a mean initial dose of 265 ± 73 mg when administered alone and of 133 ± 15 mg when co-administered with radiotherapy. Eight patients (29.6%) had a significant reduction (>30%) in tumour volume and 14 (51.9%) attained tumour stabilization. After a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 10-55), 8 out of these 22 showed disease progression. A longer progression-free survival was found in the five patients who received concomitant radiotherapy. Seven patients (25%) died (all of them because of tumour progression or complications of treatments) at 77 months (IQR 42-136) after diagnosis and 29 months (IQR 16-55) after the first dose of temozolomide. Adverse effects occurred in 18 patients (14 mild and 4 moderate or severe). In conclusion, temozolomide is an effective medical treatment for aggressive pitNET and pituitary carcinomas but is sometimes followed by tumour progression. Co-administration with radiotherapy may increase progression-free survival.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPituitary DiseasesPituitary NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSpainTemozolomideTemozolomideaggressive pituitary tumorpituitary carcinomapituitary neuroendocrine tumorradiotherapytemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID37720528
PMCPMC10500829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.