Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720500›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2023

The effect of vitamin C in adults with sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xing Luo, Youfeng Zhu, Rui Zhang, JianQiu Zhu, Huanming Kuang, Yuebin Shao, Xinmin Guo, Bo Ning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Inflammatory phenotypes in sepsis and the role of vitamin C on the corresponding phenotypes].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2023.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xing LuoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Youfeng ZhuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
JianQiu ZhuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Huanming KuangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuebin ShaoDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinmin GuoDepartment of Ultrasonography, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Bo NingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effect of intravenous (IV) vitamin C in the treatment of sepsis remains controversial. We aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of vitamin C in the treatment of sepsis. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception through November 15th, 2022, for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of IV vitamin C treatment in patients with sepsis. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, secondary outcomes included duration of vasopressor use, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score after vitamin C treatment. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the dose and duration of IV vitamin C and region to determine whether vitamin C benefited patients with sepsis. Results: A total of 10 studies including 1,426 patients fulfilled the predefined criteria and were analyzed. Overall, there were no significant differences between the vitamin C group and the control group regarding short-term mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-1.01; Conclusion: In our study, vitamin C administration for sepsis patients was not associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality, length of ICU stay or SOFA score. However, we observed that vitamin C could reduce the duration of vasopressor use. Furthermore, sepsis patients in developing countries may benefit more from vitamin C administration than those in developed countries.

Indexed as

meta-analysismortalitysepsistreatmentvitamin C

Identifiers

PMID37720500
PMCPMC10502229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.