Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720463›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023

Automatically tracking brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Dylan G Hsu, Åse Ballangrud, Kayla Prezelski, Nathaniel C Swinburne, Robert Young, Kathryn Beal, Joseph O Deasy, Laura Cerviño, Michalis Aristophanous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dylan G HsuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Åse BallangrudDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Kayla PrezelskiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Nathaniel C SwinburneDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Robert YoungDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Kathryn BealDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Joseph O DeasyDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Laura CerviñoDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Michalis AristophanousDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patients with brain metastases (BMs) are surviving longer and returning for multiple courses of stereotactic radiosurgery. BMs are monitored after radiation with follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging every 2-3 months. This study investigated whether it is possible to automatically track BMs on longitudinal imaging and quantify the tumor response after radiotherapy. Methods: The METRO process (MEtastasis Tracking with Repeated Observations was developed to automatically process patient data and track BMs. A longitudinal intrapatient registration method for T1 MR post-Gd was conceived and validated on 20 patients. Detections and volumetric measurements of BMs were obtained from a deep learning model. BM tracking was validated on 32 separate patients by comparing results with manual measurements of BM response and radiologists' assessments of new BMs. Linear regression and residual analysis were used to assess accuracy in determining tumor response and size change. Results: A total of 123 irradiated BMs and 38 new BMs were successfully tracked. 66 irradiated BMs were visible on follow-up imaging 3-9 months after radiotherapy. Comparing their longest diameter changes measured manually vs. METRO, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.88 (p < 0.001); the mean residual error was -8 ± 17%. The mean registration error was 1.5 ± 0.2 mm. Conclusions: Automatic, longitudinal tracking of BMs using deep learning methods is feasible. In particular, the software system METRO fulfills a need to automatically track and quantify volumetric changes of BMs prior to, and in response to, radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesDeep learningImage registrationLongitudinal tumor trackingStereotactic radiosurgeryT1 MR post-Gd

Identifiers

PMID37720463
PMCPMC10500025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.