Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720352›Full record

ArticleExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2023

Deep learning based clinico-radiological model for paediatric brain tumor detection and subtype prediction.

Abhishek Mahajan, Mayur Burrewar, Ujjwal Agarwal, Bharadwaj Kss, Apparao Mlv, Amrita Guha, Arpita Sahu, Amit Choudhari, Vivek Pawar, Vivek Punia and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Abhishek MahajanClatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8YA, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6606-6537
Mayur BurrewarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Ujjwal AgarwalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-0696
Bharadwaj KssEndimension Technology Pvt Ltd, Maharashtra, India.
Apparao MlvEndimension Technology Pvt Ltd, Maharashtra, India.
Amrita GuhaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Arpita SahuDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Amit ChoudhariDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Vivek PawarEndimension Technology Pvt Ltd, Maharashtra, India.
Vivek PuniaEndimension Technology Pvt Ltd, Maharashtra, India.
Sridhar EpariDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Ayushi SahayDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Tejpal GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Girish ChinnaswamyDepartment of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Prakash ShettyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Aliasgar MoiyadiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Early diagnosis of paediatric brain tumors significantly improves the outcome. The aim is to study magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of paediatric brain tumors and to develop an automated segmentation (AS) tool which could segment and classify tumors using deep learning methods and compare with radiologist assessment. Methods: This study included 94 cases, of which 75 were diagnosed cases of ependymoma, medulloblastoma, brainstem glioma, and pilocytic astrocytoma and 19 were normal MRI brain cases. The data was randomized into training data, 64 cases; test data, 21 cases and validation data, 9 cases to devise a deep learning algorithm to segment the paediatric brain tumor. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the deep learning model were compared with radiologist's findings. Performance evaluation of AS was done based on Dice score and Hausdorff95 distance. Results: Analysis of MRI semantic features was done with necrosis and haemorrhage as predicting features for ependymoma, diffusion restriction and cystic changes were predictors for medulloblastoma. The accuracy of detecting abnormalities was 90%, with a specificity of 100%. Further segmentation of the tumor into enhancing and non-enhancing components was done. The segmentation results for whole tumor (WT), enhancing tumor (ET), and non-enhancing tumor (NET) have been analyzed by Dice score and Hausdorff95 distance. The accuracy of prediction of all MRI features was compared with experienced radiologist's findings. Substantial agreement observed between the classification by model and the radiologist's given classification [K-0.695 (K is Cohen's kappa score for interrater reliability)]. Conclusions: The deep learning model had very high accuracy and specificity for predicting the magnetic resonance (MR) characteristics and close to 80% accuracy in predicting tumor type. This model can serve as a potential tool to make a timely and accurate diagnosis for radiologists not trained in neuroradiology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrainstem gliomaDeep learning modelependymomamedulloblastomapaediatric brain tumorspilocytic astrocytoma

Identifiers

PMID37720352
PMCPMC10501890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.