ArticleOman medical journal2023
Assessing Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Primary Care Physicians in Bahrain: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Oman medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guideline adherence for the management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- From policy to practice and vice versa: a cross-sectional study of healthcare workers' perspectives on safeguarding public health service access for displaced populations in Iran.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Are Primary Care Practitioners Ready for Evidence-based Clinical Practice?Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- Article
- Prescribers' adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension at public hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.Sage open chronic diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and explore the barriers to their implementation among primary care physicians (PCPs) in Bahrain. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey among physicians working in 20 randomly selected public sector primary health centers in Bahrain. Private-sector physicians and family medicine residents were excluded. Outcome measures were assessing the extent of adherence to CPGs, describing the results in association with work roles, gender, level of formal training, and years of working experience, and investigating the barriers to adhering to CPGs. Results: The subjects were 149 PCPs (consultants, specialists, and general practitioners) working in government primary health centers. The vast majority (98.0%) reported that they implemented CPGs in their daily practice. The most commonly cited reason (79.2%) for implementation was that the CPGs were evidence-based. The most implemented guidelines pertained to diabetes (91.3%), hypertension (81.2%), and hyperlipidemia (69.8%). The least implemented ones were screening of women (38.9%) and postnatal care (45.6%). The level of formal medical training was associated with the implementation of CPGs on preventive care, antenatal and postnatal care, and children and women screening ( Conclusions: Most PCPs in Bahrain are adherent to CPGs in their daily practice and encounter minimal barriers. Identifying and resolving barriers can help develop unified and standardized guidelines that promote better consistency in patient management, minimize medical errors, and conserve resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.