Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720329›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2023

Guiding maps of solvents for lithium-sulfur batteries via a computational data-driven approach.

Rasha Atwi, Nav Nidhi Rajput

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rasha AtwiDepartment of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Nav Nidhi RajputDepartment of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practical realization of lithium-sulfur batteries requires designing optimal electrolytes with controlled dissolution of polysulfides, high ionic conductivity, and low viscosity. Computational chemistry techniques enable tuning atomistic interactions to discover electrolytes with targeted properties. Here, we introduce ComBat (Computational Database for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries), a public database of ∼2,000 quantum-chemical and molecular dynamics properties for lithium-sulfur electrolytes composed of solvents spanning 16 chemical classes. We discuss the microscopic origins of polysulfide clustering and the diffusion mechanism of electrolyte components. Our findings reveal that polysulfide solubility cannot be determined by a single solvent property like dielectric constant. Rather, observed trends result from the synergistic effect of multiple factors, including solvent C/O ratio, fluorination degree, and steric hindrance effects. We propose binding energy as a proxy for Li

Indexed as

binding energydatabasedensity functional theoryelectrolytehigh-throughput calculationslithium-sulfur batteriesmolecular dynamics simulationsquantum chemistrysolventstructural and dynamical properties

Identifiers

PMID37720329
PMCPMC10499867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.