Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720307›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2023

Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide on survey administration.

Kathleen Y Ogle, Jeffery Hill, Sally A Santen, Michael Gottlieb, Anthony R Artino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathleen Y OgleGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-0895
Jeffery HillUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Sally A SantenUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8002
Michael GottliebRush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375
Anthony R ArtinoGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-7853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we take the lessons learned from designing a survey and collecting validity evidence and prepare to administer the survey for research. We focus specifically on how researchers can reach individuals in the target population, methods of contact and engagement, evidence-informed factors that enhance participation, and recommendations for follow-up with nonrespondents. We also discuss the challenges of survey administration and provide guidance for navigating low response rates. Surveys are a common tool used to evaluate educational initiatives and collect data for all types of research. However, many clinician educators conducting survey-based evaluation and research may struggle to efficiently administer their survey. As a result, they often struggle to obtain appropriate response rates and thus may have difficulty publishing their survey results. Previous papers in this series focused on the initial steps of survey development and validation, but it is equally important to understand how best to administer your survey to obtain meaningful responses from a representative sample.

Identifiers

PMID37720307
PMCPMC10502677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.