Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720223›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib with or without programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Zhanqi Wei, Yajing Wang, Boyang Wu, Ying Liu, Yaqin Wang, Zhizhong Ren, Xiaowei Yang, Qian Chen, Yuewei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhanqi WeiHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yajing WangHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Boyang WuHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ying LiuHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yaqin WangHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhizhong RenHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xiaowei YangHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Qian ChenThorgene Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yuewei ZhangHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: New treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) due to the limited efficacy of current first-line chemotherapy regimens. Although the combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has been extensively evaluated in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, their roles in advanced CCA remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of HAIC plus lenvatinib with or without PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced CCA. Methods: Between March 2019 to June 2022, patients diagnosed with advanced CAA who received HAIC plus lenvatinib with or without PD-1 inhibitors treatment were reviewed for eligibility. Efficacy was evaluated according to survival and tumor response, and safety was evaluated according to the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: Fifty-five patients with advanced CCA were included in the study, and they were divided into the HAIC+lenvatinib (LEN)+PD-1 inhibitors (PD-1i) group (n = 35) and HAIC+LEN group (n = 20). The median follow-up time was 14.0 (5-42) months. Patients in the HAIC+LEN+PD-1i group had significantly better PFS (HR = 0.390; 95% CI 0.189-0.806; p = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.461; 95% CI 0.229-0.927; p = 0.01) than those in the HAIC+LEN group. The HAIC+LEN+PD-1i group showed a higher objective response rate and disease control rate than the HAIC+LEN group but did not find a significant difference. The incidence of grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 AEs was not significantly higher in the HAIC+LEN+PD-1i group compared to the HAIC+LEN group, whereas two patients (5.7%) in the HAIC+LEN+PD-1i group experienced grade 5 immune-mediated pneumonia. Conclusion: HAIC plus lenvatinib with PD-1 inhibitors is safe and well-tolerated, and has the potential to prolong the survival of patients with advanced CCA. The addition of PD-1 inhibitors may enhance the efficacy of HAIC and lenvatinib. Therefore, the combined therapy has the potential to become a treatment option for advanced CCA.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaLiver NeoplasmsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorslenvatinibPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesadvanced cholangiocarcinomaefficacyhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapylenvatinibprogrammed cell death protein-1 inhibitorsafety

Identifiers

PMID37720223
PMCPMC10502306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.