Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720190›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023

Multiexposure laser speckle contrast analysis system calibration limited by perfusion-dependent scattering on the skin.

Tamás Smausz, Bence Kondász

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tamás SmauszUniversity of Szeged, Department of Optics and Quantum Electronics, Szeged, Hungary.
Bence KondászUniversity of Szeged, Department of Optics and Quantum Electronics, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3838-0702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Application of multiexposure speckle contrast imaging (MESI) methods for perfusion measurements can correct for the contribution of static scattering of the skin, at the expense of reduced temporal resolution as compared to classical single-exposure methods. Persistence of tissue scattering properties during the measurements could allow for an initial calibration and enhancement of the temporal resolution of the measurements. Aim: We aim to study the influence of the perfusion on the light scattering of the forearm skin and to use the obtained data for the enhancement of the temporal resolution. Approach: A wide range of skin perfusion states was induced while monitoring the changes in the dynamic range of the exposure-dependent contrast. Different measurement and evaluation methods were tested based on an initial MESI calibration followed by image recording with reduced number of exposure time values. Results: The changes in the skin perfusion can alter not only the contribution of the static scattering to the speckle images but also the short-exposure time contrast limit. Conclusions: The perfusion-dependent scattering of the skin can invalidate the precalibrations (e.g.,

Indexed as

ForearmSkinCalibrationHumansLasersPerfusionlaser speckle contrast analysislight scatteringskin perfusionspeckle imaging

Identifiers

PMID37720190
PMCPMC10502513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.