Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720185›Full record

ArticleCJC open2023

Family Participation in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit Rounds: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Vanessa Debay, Sophie Hallot, Alexander Calderone, Michael Goldfarb

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05528185 (Family Participation in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Rounds), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05528185 naunknown statusnot on this map

Family Participation in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Rounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The FAM-CICU Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLady Davis InstituteRan2022 to 2023Enrolled220ConditionsFamily Members, Health Care Providers, Engagement, PatientArmsDirect participation of the family member in the daily rounds
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Family Support Strategies During Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanessa DebayMcGill Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sophie HallotMcGill Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alexander CalderoneDepartment of Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michael GoldfarbDivision of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Observational studies have shown an association between family participation in intensive care unit (ICU) rounds and better family-centred outcomes. However, evidence from randomized studies on the impact of family participation in ICU rounds is lacking. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of a randomized trial for family participation in ICU rounds and obtain preliminary estimates of effect to inform a future effectiveness trial. Methods: Family members of patients in the cardiovascular ICU at an academic tertiary-care hospital were randomized to the intervention (participation in rounds) or usual-care group. Following ICU discharge, family member participants completed the family satisfaction (Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit Survey [FS-ICU]). Feasibility metrics were recruitment (≥ 10 participants per month), uptake (≥ 80%), and follow-up (≥ 80%). Effectiveness was measured by between-group differences in survey score at follow-up. Results: A total of 27 participants were recruited over 8 weeks. A total of 44% of family members (27 of 61) who were approached agreed to participate. Nonparticipation was due most commonly to lack of interest (N = 20; 64%). All family members randomized to the intervention (N = 16) were present for rounds (100% uptake). Follow-up data were available for 23 participants (85%). Family members who participated in rounds had a higher level of satisfaction with care, compared to the usual-care group (87.3 vs 74.7, Conclusions: Family participation in cardiovascular ICU rounds is feasible and effective at improving family satisfaction. Our findings will inform the design of a planned, larger, multicentre study to evaluate the effectiveness of family participation in ICU rounds to improve family-centred outcomes. Trial registration number: NCT05528185.

Identifiers

PMID37720185
PMCPMC10502430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.