ReviewCJC open2023
Heart Failure Management in 2023: A Pharmacotherapy- and Lifestyle-Focused Comparison of Current International Guidelines.
Review in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of vericiguat in heart failure across ejection fraction phenotypes: a comprehensive meta-analytic trial sequential analysis and meta-regression analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Pim1 Mitigates Heart Failure by Suppressing Ferroptosis Via Activation of the mTORC1/SLC7A11/GPX4 Axis.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Functional Status of Patients with Long-Term Mechanical Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Relation to Physical Activity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven design and optimization of mitochondria-targeted nanocarriers for chronic heart failure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microbiome and Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review of Gut Health and Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Heart Failure Progression.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparing Life's Simple 7 and Life's Essential 8 With Risk of Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and treatment of patients with iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia: a study on longitudinal German health claims data.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Comparison of Quadruple Therapy Sequencing Strategies for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Precision Medicine: Therapeutically Targeting Mitochondrial Alterations in Heart Failure.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Review
- MitoQ Protects Against Oxidative Stress-Induced Mitochondrial Dysregulation in Human Cardiomyocytes.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Article
- Chronic Heart Failure Rehabilitation: Diaphragm Training Needs More Attention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Sodium restrictions in heart failure.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025Article
- Herbal Interactions with Cardiac Medications: A Comprehensive Review of Potential Interactions between Herbal Drugs and Commonly Prescribed Cardiac Medications.Current drug safety · 2025Review
- CTRP6-mediated cardiac protection in heart failure via the AMPK/SIRT1/PGC-1α signalling pathway.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
- Iron deficiency and supplementation in heart failure.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Cytokines in Predicting Hospital Readmissions in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- AMPK Signalling Pathway: A Potential Strategy for the Treatment of Heart Failure with Chinese Medicine.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review examines the pharmacotherapy and lifestyle recommendations of the most recent iterations of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) / Canadian Heart Failure Society (CHFS), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the American Heart Association (AHA) / American College of Cardiology (ACC) / Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) heart failure (HF) guidelines, which all have been updated in response to therapeutic developments across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Identified areas of unanimity across these guidelines include the following: recommending quadruple therapy for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; although no guideline proposed an ideal sequence of initiation); intravenous iron administration for patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency; and sodium restriction for patients with HF. Recent evidence regarding the harms of HFrEF medication withdrawal in patients with HF with improved ejection fraction has prompted subsequent guidelines to recommend against withdrawal. Due to the lower quality of evidence, there are disagreements regarding management of HF with preserved ejection fraction and uncertainty regarding management of HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction. Practical guidance is provided to clinicians navigating these challenging areas. In addition to these clinically focused comparisons, we describe opportunities for guideline improvement and harmonization. Specifically, these include opportunities regarding HFrEF sequencing, the need for timely updates, shared decision-making, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework adoption, and the creation of recommendations where high-quality evidence is lacking. Although these guidelines have broad agreement, key areas of controversy remain that may be addressed by emerging evidence and changes in guideline methodology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.