ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib-Containing Regimens in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemotherapy-free anlotinib-based regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Research progress of anti-angiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Low-dose anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors offers better efficacy and safety in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment.Anti-cancer drugs · 2025Article
- Clinical efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus oral vinorelbine as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed stage IIIB-IV nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with performance status 2 or age ≥75 years.Anti-cancer drugs · 2025Article
- Synergizing Success: The Role of Anlotinib Combinations in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with vinorelbine as second‑line treatment for elderly patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma: A retrospective cohort.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Anlotinib enhances the anti-tumor activity of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by reversing drug resistance.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a risk-prediction model for adverse drug reactions in real-world cancer patients treated with anlotinib.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/L1 Inhibitors Combined with Anlotinib versus PD-1/L1 Inhibitors Combined with Bevacizumab in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Article
- Statin-Associated Liver Dysfunction and Muscle Injury: epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Management Strategies.International journal of general medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anlotinib is widely used in the clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alone or in combination with other anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib-containing regimens. Patients and Methods: Confirmed advanced NSCLC patients who had received anlotinib alone or in combination were enrolled. An overall analysis of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib was performed in all patients, and then subgroup analysis was used to further compare the efficacy between anlotinib monotherapy and combination therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were ADR, ORR, and DCR. Results: A total of 240 patients were included. The overall median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-9.9 months). Anlotinib treatment regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) and whether they received previous antiangiogenesis were associated with PFS. Anlotinib plus immunotherapy achieved longer PFS than anlotinib monotherapy (median PFS: 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.007). Stratification analysis showed the PFS of anlotinib plus immunotherapy was significantly longer in male, adenocarcinoma, <=65 years old, patients stage IV, EGFR wild type, with extrathoracic metastasis, performance status scores ≥2, the first-line treatment, patients with a history of hypertension and no previous antiangiogenesis than anlotinib monotherapy. The median PFS of anlotinib plus chemotherapy, targeted therapy was slightly longer than anlotinib alone (respectively, 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.095; 9.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.177). Adverse reactions were mostly mild and acceptable, with hypertension being the most common. Conclusion: Anlotinib is effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients. Immunotherapy combination with anlotinib significantly improved PFS. The efficacy of anlotinib may be impaired by previous antiangiogenic therapy, which can be investigated in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.