Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720061›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Habitat geometry rather than visual acuity limits the visibility of a ground-nesting bird's clutch to terrestrial predators.

George R A Hancock, Lizzie Grayshon, Ryan Burrell, Innes Cuthill, Andrew Hoodless, Jolyon Troscianko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How does viewing angle affect the perceived accuracy of Batesian mimicry in hoverflies?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  7. Snake markings facilitate diverse anti-predator functions depending on habitat and viewing angle.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

George R A HancockCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8771-545X
Lizzie GrayshonGame and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fordingbridge UK.
Ryan BurrellFaculty of Science and Technology Bournemouth University Dorset UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1001-2761
Innes CuthillSchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-8856
Andrew HoodlessGame and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fordingbridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-3005
Jolyon TrosciankoCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-2594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nests of ground-nesting birds rely heavily on camouflage for their survival, and predation risk, often linked to ecological changes from human activity, is a major source of mortality. Numerous ground-nesting bird populations are in decline, so understanding the effects of camouflage on their nesting behavior is relevant to their conservation concerns. Habitat three-dimensional (3D) geometry, together with predator visual abilities, viewing distance, and viewing angle, determine whether a nest is either visible, occluded, or too far away to detect. While this link is intuitive, few studies have investigated how fine-scale geometry is likely to help defend nests from different predator guilds. We quantified nest visibility based on 3D occlusion, camouflage, and predator visual modeling in northern lapwings,

Indexed as

3D scanningcamouflageground‐nesting birdslapwingocclusion

Identifiers

PMID37720061
PMCPMC10501817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.