Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719890›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2023

Comparisons of the effects of silk elastin and collagen sponges on wound healing in murine models.

Eiichi Sawaragi, Hiroki Yamanaka, Yuanjiaozi Li, Tomo Unzai, Shingo Kawabata, Takashi Nakano, Yasuhiro Katayama, Michiharu Sakamoto, Yasuhiko Tabata, Naoki Morimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Silk-elastin sponge is effective for burn therapy after surgical debridement.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eiichi SawaragiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroki YamanakaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuanjiaozi LiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomo UnzaiLaboratory of Biomaterials, Institute for Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shingo KawabataSanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd., Katsura Research Laboratory, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi NakanoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuhiro KatayamaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Michiharu SakamotoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuhiko TabataLaboratory of Biomaterials, Institute for Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki MorimotoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introductions: Silk elastin, a recombinant protein with repeats of elastin and silk fibroin, possesses a self-gelling ability and is a potential wound dressing material. The aim of this study is to elucidate the mechanism of the wound healing-promoting effect of silk elastin by comparing its in vivo behavior in a mouse wound model with that of a collagen sponge. Methods: Skin defects (8 mm in diameter) were created on the backs of C57BL/6J and BKS.Cg- + Lepr/+Lepr db male mice. Silk elastin sponges of 2.5 or 5.0 mm thickness, as well as collagen sponges, were placed on the wounds and secured with a polyurethane film. In the control group, only the polyurethane film was applied. The remaining wound area was grossly evaluated, and tissue samples were collected after 7, 14, and 21 days for histological evaluation, including neoepithelialization, wound contraction, granulation tissue formation, newly formed capillaries, and macrophages. Genetic analysis was conducted using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: In the study with C57BL/6J, there were no significant differences between the silk elastin and collagen sponge groups. Similarly, in the study using BKS.Cg- + Lepr/+Lepr db, no significant differences were found in the remaining wound area and granulation tissue formation between the silk elastin and collagen sponge groups. However, on day 14, the 5.0-mm-thick silk elastin sponge group showed increased macrophages, longer neoepithelialization, and more frequent angiogenesis compared to other groups. Gene expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and arginase-1 was also higher in the 5.0 mm thick silk elastin sponge group. Conclusions: Silk elastin sponges demonstrated superior neoepithelialization and angiogenesis compared to collagen sponges. The results suggest that silk elastin and collagen sponges promote wound healing through different mechanisms, with silk elastin possibly enhancing wound healing by facilitating increased macrophage migration. Further studies are needed, but silk elastin shows great potential as a versatile wound dressing material.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisMacrophagesNeoepithelializationRecombinant proteinsWound healing

Identifiers

PMID37719890
PMCPMC10502320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.