Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719877›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genome editing2023

Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts.

Ida Westberg, Frida Meijer Carlsen, Ida Elisabeth Johansen, Bent Larsen Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genome editing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Prime Editing Modification with FEN1 Improves F508del Variant Editing in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ida WestbergDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Frida Meijer CarlsenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Ida Elisabeth JohansenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Bent Larsen PetersenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato (

Indexed as

cytosine base editorgenome editingnative promotorpotatoprotoplastU6 promotor

Identifiers

PMID37719877
PMCPMC10502308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.